Poetic Invectives. Strategies of legitimation between literary tradition and fictitious orality (B)

在假设谩骂言语也是对古罗马社会规则的违反的背景下，拉丁主义子项目探讨了共和国后期和罗马帝国早期诗歌文本中使用的显性和隐性策略，以证明语言暴力的合理性。例如，在一个实施例中，自卫叙事，作为道德谴责或客观批评的框架，作为自发想法或大师妙语的制定）。由于对文学传统（特别是讽刺、抑扬格、讽刺警句）的自我归因也可以被理解为合法化策略的一部分，因此文本将被视为诗歌谩骂的相互影响的领域。

Against the background of the assumption that invective speech was a violation of social rules also in ancient Rome, the Latinist sub-project explores the explicit and implicit strategies used in poetic texts from the Later Republic and the early Roman Empire to justify linguistic violence (e. g., self-defense narratives, framing as moral rebuke or objective criticism, enactment as spontaneous idea or virtuoso punchline). Since the self-attribution to a literary tradition (in particular satire, iambic, mocking epigram) can also be understood as part of the legitimation strategy, the texts will be considered as a mutually influencing field of poetic invective.