The Exclusive Corpus of Scholia on Aristotle in the Codex Parisinus graecus 1853 (E): First Critical Complete Edition

这项研究的迫切需要仍然是亚里士多德著作的批判性版本，几乎没有被探索过，基本上没有编辑过，亚里士多德被证明是手稿形式中被复制最广泛的亵渎作者，也是古代和拜占庭中世纪最具注解和释义的希腊作家。“学者”一词被理解为(在Margine或InterLineas中)解释性(短或长)文本，即作为另一段或正文的语言或实质性解释的副文本。由于其多方面的意义，学术是他们自己的批评版本的主题。这些文本的用处体现在它们为历史传播、传播和接受历史提供了宝贵的材料，以及它们的历史来源的背景。1853年《学术》，包括对学术文献语料库的调查、评估、编辑和文献学发展。无论是在文本编辑领域，还是在文化史和知识史领域，现代学术都将校订和手稿分析以及根据来源对学术文本进行分类，作为研究(亚里士多德)文本传播史和亚里士多德学派历史的基础。

An urgent desideratum of the research remains the critical edition of the barely explored and largely unedited scholia to the writings of Aristotle, who proves to be the most widely duplicated profane author in manuscript form and the most annotated and paraphrased Greek author both in ancient times and in the Byzantine Middle Ages.The term "scholia" is understood to mean explanatory (short or longer) texts (in margine or inter lineas), that is to say the kind of paratexts which serve as a linguistic or substantive interpretation of another passage or main text. Because of their manifold significance scholia are the subject of their own critical editions. The usefulness of such texts manifests itself in the valuable material they provide for historical dissemination, transmission and reception history as well as the background to their historical sources.The aim of the project is the edition of the Codex Parisinus gr. 1853 scholia, which includes the investigation, evaluation, edition and philological development of a corpus of scholia texts. Modern scholarship both in the field of text edition and in cultural history and history of knowledge considers the recension and manuscript analysis as well as the classification of the scholia texts according to their sources as groundlaying for their research in the history of the transmission of (Aristotelian) text and in the history of Aristotelianisms.