Research for Movement of Objects, Treasures, Art Works and Cultural Properties; Transition of Sense of Values and Society

近年来，通过对“美术”和“艺术史”形成的研究，我们清楚地看到，“艺术作品”的出现只是历史的一个步骤。在“审美价值”的普遍性神话崩塌的今天，脱离了对象价值必然物化的艺术史研究，需要对对象的价值形成体系重新提出质疑。一件“物品”在成为“艺术品”之前，在历史上被赋予了各种价值。作为考虑到这一点的切入点，本研究建立了“运动”的观点。因为在运动的过程中，物体的价值在质上和量上都发生了变化，或者形成了另一种价值，促使物体再次运动。本研究旨在通过跟踪对象的运动来分析对象价值形成的动态性，解决对象的当下存在。根据上述目的，开展了资料收集、内外调研、数据处理、资料整理、会议研究等工作。在前近代的研究中，仔细地审视了近代日本艺术史形成之前的物品价值形成，并具体地验证了这是一种什么样的体系。在现当代的研究中，在组织艺术史的同时，追问在这一过程中存在着怎样的价值形成体系。在对外国艺术的研究中，探索了在日本没有留下的涉及物体运动的价值形成的各种情况。同时，寻求表演艺术史、建筑史和考古学研究者的合作，以相同的视角，揭示了画史或雕塑史研究者容易忽视的情况，旨在使研究内容得到充实。因此，无论一个对象是具体的还是无形的，无论是在艺术史形成之前还是之后，所谓的“接受史”的重要性和价值变化的轻盈性都变得清晰起来。此外，在这里，那些背诵价值的人的自主性，以及作为自主性积累或遗忘的结果而存在的价值，也刚刚得到了缓解。少

In recent years, it became clear through the research on formation of "fine arts" and "art history" that the appearance of an "art work" is only one step of history. The art historical research which must have been materialized if it separates from value of objects needs to question again anew about the system of value formation of objects, now when the universality myth of "aesthetic value" collapsed. An "object" has been given various values in history, before serving as an "art work." As a cut end that considers this, the viewpoint of "movement" was set up by this research. Because, while moving, an object's value changes qualitatively and quantitatively, or another value forms, and it urges an object to move again.This research aimed at analyzing the dynamism of value formation of objects by following movement of objects, and solving the present existence of objects. The basis of the above-mentioned purpose, collection of materials, investigation in and outside, data processing of … More materials, holding of meetings for study, etc. were performed. In the research of pre-modem times, value formation of objects before formation of the art history in modem Japan was gazed at carefully, and it verified concretely what kind of system was there. In the research of modem-contemporary times, while the art history was organized, it asked what kind of value formation system there was in the process. In research of foreign art, various situations of the value formation involving movement of objects that does not remain in Japan were explored. Moreover, it looked for cooperation of researcher for the history of performing art, the history of architect and the archaeology, the situation which the researcher of the history of pictures or the history of sculpture tends to overlook was surfaced by taking the same viewpoint in each field, and it aimed at making the contents of research enhance.As a result, the importance of the so-called "history of acceptance" and the lightness of a value change became clear irrespective of whether an object is concrete or intangible, whether before or after formation of art history. Moreover, in it, autonomies of those who recite value, and the present existence of the value as a result of accumulation or oblivion of autonomies were also just thrown into relief. Less