Parental Responsibility as Fundamental Right and Obligation. A reconstruction of Art. 6 Abs. 2 Basic Law

带着我重建的艺术6秒。2.《基本法》我的目标是重新找到一个可行的概念起点，以便能够以与其目前监管主题的多样性相适应的复杂程度来解决当前应用父母基本权利方面的问题。本研究的出发点是多重矛盾和悬而未决的问题，对这些矛盾和悬而未决的问题，一方面是将基本亲权解释为对儿童最大利益的权利，另一方面是对基本权利教条式运作的时间维度的系统忽视(第一部分)。在宪法大会基本权利的起源(第二部分)的基础上，我在论文的两个核心部分重构了基本权利在宪法学中的解释和适用的错综复杂的方式。在发展的第一线，我调查了《基本法》第六条第(二)款赋予父母的决定权的内容和时间限制问题如何从儿童的独立基本权利地位(第三部分)反映出来。在第二条发展线上，我接着讨论了如何处理基本权利的运作问题，以应对基本权利多元化带来的挑战和家庭形式多元化的后果(第四部分)。在这些发展路线的基础上，现在第一次有可能深入了解宪法如何对社会变化作出反应，以及它如何通过对基本权利的变化的解释来建设性地适应社会变化。在此基础上，我得以有系统地重新设计《基本法》第六(二)条(第五部分)，通过更准确地将儿童和父母的利益观点分开，不仅在概念层面上更好地考虑到父母的合法利益，而且更清楚地提高了对儿童基本权利地位的认识。这种重建是为了应对多元化家庭形式和多父母群体所带来的挑战，主张进一步从以机构为导向的解释范式过渡到以个人为导向的解释范式。

With my reconstruction of Art. 6 sec. 2 Basic Law I have pursued the goal of regaining a viable conceptual starting point from which the current problems of the application of the parental fundamental right can be address with a level of complexity appropriate to the current diversity of its regulatory subject-matter. The starting point of the study was the manifold ambivalences and open questions, to which the dominant interpretation of the fundamental parental right as a right in the best interest of the child on the one hand, and a methodical neglect of the time dimension of fundamental right dogmatical operationalization on the other hand, gave rise (I. part).On the basis of the genesis of the fundamental right in the constitutional assembly (Part II), I have reconstructed in the two central parts of my thesis the intricate ways of its interpretation and application in constitutional jurisprudence. In a first line of development, I have investigated the question of how the problem of the content and temporal limits of the power of determination granted to parents by Article 6(2) of the Basic Law is reflected in the light of the child's independent fundamental right status (Part III). With a second line of development, I then followed up on how the operationalisation of fundamental rights has been dealt with regards to the challenges of the plurality of fundamental rights and the consequences of pluralized family forms (Part IV). On the basis of these lines of development, it is now possible for the first time to understand in depth how constitutional law reacts to social change and how it constructively adapts to it through a changing interpretation of fundamental rights.The reconstruction of its history of application drew attention to the factual problems a convincing interpretation of the parental fundamental right must address. In this way, an adequate awareness of the temporal contextual dependence of certain legal solutions as well as of the social conditions of their respective problem-solving plausibility could be gained.Building on this, I was then able to design a systematic reconstruction of Article 6(2) of the Basic Law (V. Part), which, through a more precise separation of the perspectives of the interests of the child and the parents, not only succeeds in taking better account of the legitimate parental interest at the conceptual level, but also to raise awareness more clearly of the fundamental rights positions of the child. The reconstruction responds to the challenges posed by pluralized family forms and multi-parent constellations by advocation of a further transition from an institution-oriented to an individual-oriented paradigm of interpretation.