Self-determination and Consensus-formation in Japanese Legalizing Society

我们提出了一个基本框架，在这个框架中，自决权作为宪法权利适用于民事法律中的合同关系从市场规制的角度对英美判例法中关于契约自由和贸易自由的问题进行了梳理我们明确了自决权与生存权之间的复杂关系，作为劳动法的基本理念我们明确了一个基本框架，在这个框架中，法律有助于解决生物伦理和医学伦理方面的自决和合法化问题，以及护理专业人员与法律或伦理之间的关系针对日本的民族自决与法制化问题，提出了纠纷解决制度中多元权利形成的基本框架，并从法律与民族自决的角度探讨了现代风险社会明确了自主价值与完美主义自由主义的关系我们根据社会选择理论和博弈论中使用的机会集概念来定义选择自由的概念10 .我们探讨了罗尔斯正义理论中差异原则与互惠的关系我们讲清楚了罗尔斯所说的公共理性是如何应用于法律的，以及公共理性在言论正义方面的局限性。

1 We proposed a basic framework in which self-determination rights as constitutional rights are applied to contract relationship in civil law.2 We made clear Anglo-American case law about freedom of contract and freedom of trade in the perspective of market regulation.3 We made clear complex relation between self-determination rights and rights to existence as the basic ideas of labor law.4 We made clear a basic framework in which law contributes to resolving problems of self-determination and legalization in bioethical and medical ethics, and relation between professionals of care and law or ethics.5 We presented a basic framework in terms of which pluralist rights-formation in dispute resolution system is ordered in view of self-determination and legalization problems in Japan.6 We inquired our modern risk-society in the perspective of law and self-determination.7 We made clear the relation between value of autonomy and perfectionist liberalism.8 We defined the concept of freedom of choice in terms of the concept of opportunity set used in social choice theory and game theory.9 We inquired the relation of difference principle and reciprocity in J.Rawls' theory of justice.10 We made clear how what Rawls calls public reason is applied to law, and the limits of public reason in terms of justice of talk.