Interactions of neosalafi, delinquent and non-delinquent youth in marginalized neighborhoods

这项研究项目的目的是经验性地检验Neosalafi、边缘社区的犯罪青年和非犯罪青年的动态相互作用的三者。该研究项目解决了一个盲点，即一方面，对新萨拉菲主义和激进化的研究在很大程度上忽视了社会空间；至少在与同行和当地行为者的互动方面是这样。另一方面，对青少年犯罪的研究也只是粗浅地探讨了犯罪青少年和非犯罪青少年之间的互动。这三个环境都没有同时在特定的社区进行检查，他们在那里一起长大，共同生活，或多或少每天都在互动。总而言之，我们结合了IKG多年来检验过的不同研究路线。因此，我们考虑以前的发现，以便在这个项目中超越最先进的状态，并使用为社会空间研究获得重要新发现的选项。为了实现这些目标，我们使用横断面方法，主要是定性方法。我们认为这种方法具有很高的创新潜力，因为我们的经验知识表明，如果年轻人(主要)在这里一起长大，这三个环境之间的相互联系，特别是在边缘化的社区。在这些环境的边界上的日常经历被提及，边界过境，以及外部对边界的影响的经历。这包括其他人(个人)在不同环境中的参与是如何被加热的，以及/或者人们如何试图对此产生影响。实证研究包括60个叙事性传记访谈、10个专家访谈、12个以问题为中心的访谈、8个小组访谈和参与式观察。除专家访谈外，所有访谈都是与来自柏林-诺伊克伦和伍珀塔尔-沃温克尔的14至18岁的年轻人进行的。

The aim of the research project is to empirically examine the triad of interactions of dynamics of neosalafi, delinquent and non-delinquent youth in marginalized neighborhoods. The research project addresses the blind spot that, on the one hand, research on neosalafism and radicalization largely neglects the social space; at least in terms of interactions with peers and local actors. On the other hand, research on juvenile delinquency also just rudimentarily addresses the interactions of delinquent and non-delinquent youth. All three milieus have not been examined in specific neighborhoods at the same time, in which they grew up together, live jointly, and interact on a more or less daily basis. All in all, we combine different research lines that are examined at the IKG for years. Therefore, we consider prior findings in order to go beyond the state of the art in this project and to use the option of gaining important new findings for socio-spatial research.In order to achieve these goals, we use a cross-sectional and mainly qualitative methodological approach. We assume high innovation potential of this approach because our empirical knowledge indicates interconnections of the three milieus, particularly in marginalized neighborhoods, if the youth (largely) grew up here together. The daily experiences at the borders of these milieus are addressed, border crossings, and experiences of external impact on the borders. This includes how the (individual) involvement of others in different milieus is thermalized and/or how people try to have an impact on that. We especially assume innovation potential in the fields of socio-spatial and interactionist research and theory formation.The empirical study contains 60 narrative-biographical interviews, 10 interviews of experts, 12 problem-centered interviews, and 8 group interviews as well as participatory observations. Apart from the interviews of experts, all interviews are conducted with young men – aged between 14 and 18 years – from Berlin-Neukölln and Wuppertal-Vohwinkel.