Should Japanese Design Law and Trademark Law be revised in order to fir internet environment?

本研究项目针对当前网络环境下日本《外观设计法》和《商标法》修改的可能性进行了3个课题的研究，包括：1)计算机和手机下载图像的外观设计保护的可能性；2)“香味”商标或气味商标的保护资格；3)在使用搜索引擎时将商标文字放入元标签是否属于“商业使用”。我们的研究计划是收集和研究国外（特别是发达国家）的立法案例、审判案例，然后考虑修改建议。关于第一个主题，即设计法领域，特别是可下载的数字图像或表格数据，用于计算机或手机。但是，由于没有完成本应在本次研究申请中进行审查的正式报告，所以改变了研究计划。”新的主题是关于一个…更多的基本原则“真正的创造者只能做应用”。这种应当由真正的创造者所拥有的申请权利被法律化，可能会被没有权利的人侵犯。佐藤写了一篇关于这个话题的案例笔记。对于第二个“香味”的商标，英国和美国的立法已经确认了不断注册的例子，但似乎没有这样的先例，即该商标可以通过互联网或其他数字技术转让。我们认为区分一件带有香味的物品是很罕见的，但这确实是一个结论，当未来有可能在市场上区分其识别标志多样化时，系统设置是必要的。第三，搜索引擎审查了使用与另一个人的商标相同的字符串在元标签中的思维方式的反对，除非它是使用一种思维方式（美国先例）和商标使用该商标的方式，并审查了类似的论点，如弹出式广告或关键词广告（keyword by）。结论的不同之处在于是否有有关字符串的指示，元标记是没有统一讨论的结论。另外，在美国和法国的研究项目结束前公布了一个名为keyword-buy的域的重要性试验实例（他们的结论不同），但由于缺乏下一次机会而被委托进行足够的检查。少

This research project is devoted 3 topics about possibility of amendment for Japan's Design Act and Trademark Act amendment corresponding to present internet circumstances, including 1) possibility of the design protection of the download image using for a computer and mobile telephone, 2) eligibility for protection for "fragrance" trademark or scent mark, 3) whether putting trademark words into meta-tag is 'use in commerce' at using search engine or not, At the initial stage, we planned that our research was going to collect and examine legislation examples, trial examples in many foreign countries (especially of developed nations), then consider amendment proposals. On the first topic, namely Design Law field, especially downloadable digital image or form data using for a computer or mobile phone. However, we could not have official report, which should be planned to be examined at this research application, was not finalized, then we changed research plan. The new topic is about one … More f the basic principles 'true creator only can make application'. Such right to make an application should be hold by real creators is codified could be infringed by somebody without the rights. Sato writes a case note on this topic. As for the trademark of the second "fragrance", constant registration example was confirmed with Britain and the United States legislation, but there seemed to be no such precedent that such mark could be transferred via internet or other digital technology. We thought that it is rare to distinguish an article with a fragrance, but it is really a conclusion that there is necessity of the system setting when it is possible future that we can distinguish its identification mark diversification in the market. The use by the third, search engine examined the opposition of the way of thinking that the use of the character string same as the trademark of another person in the metatag did unless it was used a way of thinking (an American precedent) and the trademark used the trademark for and examined similar arguments such as pop-up advertisement or a keyword advertisement (keyword by). Conclusions are different in having indication or not of the character string concerned, and a metatag is the conclusion that is not discussed uniformly. In addition, the importance trial example of a domain called keyword-buy was announced just before the end of the research project in United States of America and France (their conclusions are different), but enough examination was entrusted for lack of at the next opportunity. Less