Research of cities, towns and villages education plan-Mainly new development of a plan decision and an administrative evaluation-

本文分析了地方分权改革的第二阶段--地方政府财税体制三重改革--时期的城乡教育规划的新趋势。在阐明了对CTVEP分析的一个观点之后，笔者将接下来的两个观点作为研究的中心，以期得出区域主权下的城乡教育规划的前景.通过对CTVEP相关人员大都会、区长等（4人）对教育措施的未来的认识调查，明确了地方政府今后制定计划时的基本问题。其中4人对制定教育计划的方法意见不雅阁。关于教育措施的未来，除了一位教育集团负责人外，4人持积极的前景。这只是一个项目的康复 ...更多信息 一个4岁的人共同支持的教育。研究结果表明：1.教育措施相关者之间的意识结构趋于清晰.由于义务教育经费的收入来源可能成为赠与税税基的问题是三重改革时期最大的问题，因此笔者针对这一问题进行了详细的分析。是政府和六个地方团体把它作为一个主要的假设这是一种赠与税。使它成为一个主要的真实的意图从分析这个disipute的时间顺序上升。会有一种叫做保养的东西。文部科学省所坚持的机会均等与这一政策相冲突吗？关于补助税或补贴或一件事，一个论点是从主要维持地方政府教育预算（教师工资）稳定的角度提出的。关于对自治体自身决定地方未来地方政府教育的理想方法的方向进行大改革的争论没有得到一致的结论，这是六个地方团体的真实的意向，争论也就结束了。未来的辩论将如何发展？少

I analyzed a new tendency about the cities, towns and villages educational plan (CTVEP) of the time when the Triple reform of the local government tax and fiscal systems that was the second grade was performed of the decentralization reform. After having clarified a viewpoint for analysis of CTVEP, I put two points of the next in the center of the study for the purpose of will get the prospect of the plan of the cities, towns and villages education with area sovereignty.1. From a result of the consciousness investigation about the future of the education measure for the metropolis and districts governor and so on (person of 4) who was the person concerned of CTVEP, fundamental matters when local government devise a plan in future became clear. Among people 4, the opinion does not accord about a method to make an educational plan. About the future of the education measure, the person of 4 shares a positive prospect except an education group person in charge. It is only item of the inhab … More itants' participation to the education that a person of 4 supports all together. It is important result that consciousness structure between the people concerned over the education measure become clear.2. Because a problem that the source of revenue of duty educational expenses might become the grant tax base was the greatest problem by the time of the Triple reform, I aimed at what I analyzed about this in detail. It was the government and the six local groups to have made it a principal to assume this a grant tax. The real intention that made it a principal rose from analysis of the chronological order of this disipute. Will the thing called the maintenance. The equality of opportunity to insist on of Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology be a thing in conflict with this policy? About a grant tax or a subsidy or a thing, an argument advanced from the point of view that maintained the stability of the education budget for local government (a teacher salary) mainly. They reached the constant conclusion without the argument about being big reform to the direction where self-governing body oneself decided the ideal method of the future local government education of the place that was the real intention of the six local groups remaining, and the argument was over. How will argument in the future be developed? Less