ON THE COMPARATIVE LAW CONCERNING THE OWNERSHIP OF LAND IN ITALY AND JAPAN

本研究的目的是研究意大利和日本的所有权（地产）与城市规划法之间的关系。所有权受到来自城市规划公共利益的阻力的限制。意大利的城市规划有总体规划和几个很好的实践方法。后者包括建筑许可证（特许使用权）、分区和建筑标准。因此，所有权不是无限的，而是受到很大的限制。根据这种组织和限制，意大利法律现有制度实现了完善的城市规划和对土地权利的控制。然而，在日本却没有同样的制度。日本的制度对城镇的发展控制不够。因为它建立在完美所有权的概念之上。因此，意大利的所有制和城市规划制度有很多值得我们借鉴的地方。

THE INTENTION OF THIS STUDY IS THE RESEARCH ON THE RELATION-SHIP BETWEEN OWNERSHIP (ESTATE) AND TOWN PLANNING ACT IN ITALY ADN JAPAN.THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP (JUS AEDIFICANDI) IS LIMITED BY REST-RICTIONS WICH DERIVE FROM THE PUBLIC INTERST OF TOWN PLANNING.ITALIAN TOWN PLANNING HAS MASTERPLAN AND SEVERAL GOOD METHODS OF PRACTICE.THE LATTER CONTAINS THE BUILDING LICENSE (CONCESSIONE EDILIZIA), THE ZOWNING AND THE BUILDING STANDARDS.SO THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP IS NOT UNLIMITED BUT MEETS GREAT RESTRICTION.ACCRDING TO THIS ORGANISATION AND RESTRICTION, ITALIAN LEGAL EXISTING SYSTEM REALIZES A PERFECT TOWN PLANNING AND CONTROLS THE RIGHT FO LAND.HOWEVER THE SAME SYSTEM DOES NOT OBTAIN IN JAPAN.JAPANESE SYSTEM DOES NOT CONTROL ENOUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN.BECAUSE IT BASE ON THE NOTION OF PERFECT OWNERSHIP.SO THERE ARE MANY THINGS WE MUST LEAN FROM ITALIAN SYSTEM OF THE OWNERSHIP AND TOWN PLANNING.