A Study on the Political and Pedagogical Standpoint of Goettingen Educational Research School during the Nazi Period with Analysis of Its Unpublisched Materials

本研究从1997年开始，考察了哥廷根教育研究学校在纳粹时期的政治和教育学立场，特别是诺尔及其继任者维尼格、布洛赫曼等人的立场。通过分析诺尔死后在哥廷根大学图书馆保管的作品，可以清楚地看出，他当时反对纳粹主义的立场并不一致。在私人信件中，诺尔早在1933年就表现出反对纳粹主义的态度。然而，在出版的文本中，他一直支持纳粹主义，直到1935年左右。诺尔在1933/34年冬季任期的演讲中提出的思想与纳粹的种族意识形态相接近，这是他的特点。诺尔的继任者在对纳粹的态度上可以分为两派：一方面，E.Blochmann和C.Bondy必须移民；另一方面，O.F.Bollnow和E.Veniger对纳粹表示同情。但这两个群体很难与袭击者和受害者(或纳粹的支持者和受害者)联系在一起。除了判断这些人的道德责任外，还必须审查这些人的道德责任，以澄清它们之间的关系。这是下一个主题。

In this study, continued from 1997, I examined the political and pedagogical standpoint of Goettingen educational research school in the Nazi period, especially that of H.Nohl who was the founder of the school and his successors, E.Weniger, E.Blochmann, and so on.By analyzing Nohl's posthumous works in the custody of the library of university of Goettingen, it became clear that his standpoint against Nazism at that time was not consistant. In private letters Nohl showed an oppositional attitude against Nazism as early as 1933. However, in published texts, he was in favor of Nazism till around 1935. It is characteristic that Nohl's ideas, provided in his lecture in the winter term of 1933/34, was close to racial ideology of Nazi.Nohl's successors can be classified on attitude against Nazi into two groups : E.Blochmann and C.Bondy had to be emigrant on the one hand ; O.F.Bollnow and E.Weniger showed sympathy with Nazi on the other hand. But these two groups can not be easily identified with assailants and sufferers(or supporters of Nazi and sufferers of it). More than judging ethical responsibility of those must be examined in order to make clear their relations. This is the next theme.