To make an introduction of Chinese exegetical studies and a catalog of related papers

在此期间，我发表了四篇论文。在汉语语音方面，我选取了卡尔格仁、陆志伟（***）、东同河（***）、李方贵（***）等人的五篇研究，在《汉语训诂学论文集（上）》和《训诂学论文集（下）》中对其内容进行了说明。这两篇文章引用了大约40篇相关论文。古代中国的手机是从Karlgren的理论中展示出来的，但我解释说他的理论还有一些问题。从Karlgren到黎方贵，通过追溯他们的古汉语电话机理论的变化，我解释了：(1)古汉语电话机大约有22个韵母组；(2)古汉语的声母是由一系列音标重建而来，但由于需要假设古汉语中存在复合声母，因此往往不可靠。在中国的训诂学方面，我选择了杨树达（***）的《标点解经例题（******）》。标点符号通常放在句末，在古代它们是被忽略的。另一方面，杨树达认为它们很重要，并收集了180个经典标点错误的例子。《中国训诂学研究（三）》引用了20多篇论文和文献，并进行了详细的说明。齐培荣（***）的《中国训诂学概论》是中国第一篇优秀的科学文献。《论中国训诂学（四）》对其内容作了详细说明，并引用了数十篇文献和论文。对于与训诂学有关的汉书学，我曾尝试过文献和参考书目的解释，但这仍是一个有待解决的问题。

I have published four essays within the period.About phonetics of Chinese, I selected five studies from Karlgren, Luzhiwei (***), Dongtonghe (***), and Lifanggui (***) and explained their contents in "An essay on the Chinese Exegetical Studies (1)" and "An Essay on the Exegetical Studies (2)". The two essays quoted about 40 related papers.The phone in ancient Chinese was showed from the theory of Karlgren, but I explained that his theory still had some problems. From Karlgren to Lifanggui, by tracing changes of their theories of phones in archaic Chinese, I explained (1) the phone in archaic Chinese have about 22 final groups, (2) the initials of archaic Chinese were reconstructed from phonetic series of scripts, but it is often unreliable because it is necessary to suppose the existence of compound initials in archaic Chinese.As for the Chinese Exegetical studies, I took up "The examples of interpretation of classics by punctuation (『******』)" from Yangshuda (***). The punctuation marks are usually put at the end of the sentences, in ancient times they were neglected. On the other hand, Yangshuda regarded them as important and gathered 180 erroneous examples of punctuations of classics.. "On the Chinese Exegetical studies (3)" quoted 20 kinds of theses and literature, and explained them in detail. "An introduction of Chinese exegetical studies" of Qipeirong (***) is the first superior and scientific literature. "On the Chinese exegetical studies (4)" explains its contents in detail and quoted dozens of literature and paper.As for the Chinese graphology which relates to the exegetical studies, Ihad tried the explanation of the literature and bibliographies, but it still remain a problem to be solved in the future.