History of the Exegeses to the Digest (Book 1, 2 : Lease and Hire) of Justinian -on the Scholia of Basilics and the Works of Romanists-

本文试图探讨拜占庭法学家、注释学家和人本主义法学家对罗马契约“行为所在地”的看法。结果，我们的研究已经取得了在这个项目的两年如下：1.评论在巴西利卡的文本摘要书19 tit.2（“老scholia”）这是很清楚的解释和参考希腊作者，他们的理解文本并不经常不完善。我们在他们的作品中发现了一些巧妙的头脑。2.我们使用了“Glossa oridinaria”中的评论，阅读了《文摘》的文本。本研究所采用的人文主义法学时期的主要著作是雨果·多内勒斯的《民法注释》。他把“行为所在地”分为“事实行为所在地”和“因素行为所在地”两种类型，是系统的。我们已将lib.13.cap.6- 9.的文本翻译成日语。在接下来的研究中，我们将厘清罗马法的体系化者雨果·多内勒斯与法学天才雅各布斯·库哈西乌斯在“行为所在地”问题上的分歧。

This research is an attempt to find out what Byzantine lawyers, Glossators and humanistic jurisprudence thought about the roman contract, "locatio conductio". The results which our research has obtained during this project for two years are following :1.Commentary in the Basilica to the texts of the Digest Book 19 tit.2 ("old scholia") It is clear from explanations and references of Greek authors that their understanding of texts is not so often imperfect. We find some ingenious minds at their work.2.We used the commentary in the 'Glossa oridinaria", reading the texts of Digest. We found no any new aspects of the methods of the medieval jurists of western Europe.3.The main work at the period of Humanistic Jurisprudence we used in this research is "Commentarii de Iure Civili" of Hugo Donellus. his division of "locatio conductio" into two types, "locatio conductio rerum" and "locatio conductio factorum" is systematic. We have translated the texts of lib.13.cap.6-9.into Japanese. In the next research we will clear the contras between the systematizer of Roman law, Hugo Donellus and the juristic ingenuity, Jacobus Cujacius about the subject of "locatio conductio".