Research on the Philosophy of Nature in German Idealism (particularly F.W.J. Schelling and G.W.F. Hegel)

在这第三年里，我的研究项目朝着以下方向发展：第一，以医学史为基础，对1800年前后安德烈亚斯·罗斯劳布和克里斯托弗·威廉·胡菲兰之间的争论进行研究。第二，关于谢林和艾森迈尔的研究。关于第一个研究，我在前一年收集了罗斯劳布的材料，今年收集了霍费兰的材料，特别是他的日记。此外，我还与日本的胡菲兰研究人员取得了联系。在研究过程中，我对罗斯劳布的材料进行了整理，并从罗斯劳布材料的角度对问题进行了研究。我分析了Rtfschlab在他的《理论与实践》杂志上发表的关于布朗主义的论文，并列出了Rdschlab的文献清单。作为研究的结果，我写了一篇关于他的论文作为研究笔记。关于第二个研究，我有一篇关于这个主题的论文。我重新审视了这一主题，确认了埃森迈尔和谢林的关系可以从他们的对应关系中分析出来，但这种关系的问题和他们到1806年的辩论集中在自然哲学及其原则这一主题上。第三次辩论不同于前两次辩论的观点，即在1809年前后，与雅各比的辩论、他对斯宾诺齐斯主义的估计以及与勃赫梅的关系成为谢林思想发展的中心主题，因此我们必须以另一种形式将这第三场辩论分析为两场辩论。

In this third year I have developed my research project in following direction : Firstly the research on the debate around 1800 between Andreas Roschlaub and Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland based on the history of medicine. Secondly the research on F. W. J. Schelling and A. K. Eschenmayer.With regard to the first research I collected materials of Roschlaub in the preceding year, in this year I have collected the materials of Hufeland, particularly his journal. Moreover I have gotten in contact with Japanese researcher on Hufeland. I have been lectured by him on the life of Hufeland, particularly on the relation of Hufeland with Kant and discussed with him.In the research-process I have put materials on Roschlaub in order and investigated issues from the standpoint of Roschlaub's materials. I analyzed Rtfschlaub's papers on Brownianism in his Magazin zur Verkommnung der theoretischen und praktischen Heilkunde and drew up the list of Rdschlaub's literature. As the result of the research I have written a paper on him as researchnote.With regard to the second research I have a paper on this theme. And I reexamined this theme and confirmed that the relation of Eschenmayer with Schelling can be analyzed from their correspondence, and yet that the issue of this relation and their debate to 1806 concentrated on the theme Naturphilosophie and its principle. Third debate is different from two preceding debates on the point that around 1809 the debate with Jacobi, his estimate of Spinozismus and the relation with Boehme grew central theme in the development of Schelling's thinking Therefore we must analyze this third debate in another form as two debates.