Analysis of Norm Consciousness in the Lithuanian-Byelorussian Chronicles

1999年和2000年分别对鲁塞尼亚语动词的优先级、祈使句和虚拟语气的形态规范进行了分析。虽然语言形式的多样性是立陶宛-白俄罗斯编年史的特点，但每一份手稿都显示出自己的多样性程度。然而，很明显，个人词尾类型的统一消除了过去时两种基本亚型（现在时与未完成时）之间的对立，因此，词干形式的方面（完成时与未完成时）的区分正在标准化。教会斯拉夫语语法的描述也证明了这一点。另一方面，在语气方面，尤其是虚拟语气，在编年史文本中很难找到复杂的构成系统。2001年的研究主要集中在参考法律文本的案件结束语上。因此，观察到名词形态规范的稳定性。

In 1999 and 2000 the morphological norms of preterites, imperatives and subjunctives of Ruthenian verbs were analyzed. Although the multiplicity of verbal forms is characteristic in Lithuanian-Byelorussian Chronicles, every manuscript shows its own degree of multiplicity. Nevertheless, it is clear that the unification of the type of personal endings was liquidating the opposition between two basic subtypes of past tense (aorist v. imperfect), hence the differentiation of aspects (perfective v. imperfective) in stem forms were being standarised. It is also proved by the description of Church Slavic grammars. As for the mood, especially subjunctive, on the other hand, the complicated system of formation is hardly found in the texts of chronicles.In 2001 the main concern of research was focused on the case endings with reference to the legal texts. Consequently, the stability of morphological norms of nouns were observed.