Investigation of the production, distribution and reception process of scientific knowledges.

我们分析了科学知识的产生、流通和接受的过程，特别是与人生观有关的过程，得出了以下结论：1.在现代日本，律师的死亡标准并不盛行于社会，而是在“脑死亡”出现之前接受了常识。在“脑死亡”出现后，医生的死亡标准在社会上盛行。2.中医的研究对象仅限于活着的患者，不包括死亡或垂死的人。因此，医生们不知道他们定义了中医和日本传统医学中的死亡标准。中医的世界观和人生观都很详细、很详细。但日本只接受中医作为纯技术，拒绝世界观和人生观。因此，科学知识可能会被接受者的偏好所拒绝，如果不弄清楚接受者的特征和/或结构，我们就不会指望科学素养的发展。3.外行人可以产生精确的科学知识，就像吉川江问题一样。因此，我们呼吁完善科学知识的生产-流通-接受系统，重点放在“通俗理论”上。例如，我们必须越来越多地利用大学自己出版的期刊，而不是学术团体出版的期刊。

We analyzed the process of production, circulation and acceptance of scientific knowledge, especially related to view of life and revealed the following conclusions :1.In modern Japan, death criteria by lawyers did not prevail to society, but rather lawyers accepted common sense before the emergence of "brain death." Death criteria by medical doctors prevailed to society after the emergence of "brain death."2.Subjects of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) were restricted to patients who are alive, excluding dead or dying people. Thus medical doctors did not have idea that they define the death criteria in TCM and traditional Japanese medicine. TCM has detailed and elaborate views of world and life. But Japan accepted TCM only as pure technology, and rejected views of world and life. Therefore scientific knowledge could be rejected by preference of recipients and we would not expect the development of science literacy without clarifying the characteristic and/or structure of recipients.3.Lay people could produce precise knowledge of science, as seen in ‘Yoshinogawa-river issues.' So we claimed the improvement of production-circulation-acceptance system of scientific knowledge, focusing on "lay theories". For example, we must utilize journals published by universities themselves more and more, rather than those by academic societies.