PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHTS OF SURESVARA AND BHARTRPRAPANCA BASED ON PHILOLOGICAL STUDIES OF SANSKRIT TEXTS AND MANUSCRIPTS

桑卡拉是8世纪韦丹塔的创始人，据说是印度有史以来最伟大的哲学家。这是因为他的无限婆罗门一元论是泛印度教思想。后来，吠陀多的教师由于他们的独特性(以及他们新学校的独特性)在消除与桑卡拉的差异方面脱颖而出，尽管印度教教派普遍发展起来引入了巴克提和密宗。这种对后桑卡拉时期宗教史的研究在过去的三十年里取得了显着的发展。但对桑卡拉或前桑卡拉吠丹塔的研究一直被相当忽视。自从H·中村教授的《吠陀哲学的发展》(1955)以来，我们只有两篇论文概述了前桑卡拉吠陀哲学，即S.L.潘迪的前桑卡拉韦丹塔哲学(209-228页，1974)和A.J.阿尔斯顿(译)的《吠陀的方法》(213-259页，1989)。现在，婆罗达兰亚科帕尼萨德是最重要的奥义书之一，因为它涉及玛哈瓦…。更多的kyas，如aham brahmasmi，tat tvam asi，因此桑卡拉的bhasya和suresvara的Vartika也被认为是重要的作品。Bhartrprapanca是Advaita Vedanta的对手，是Brhadaranyakopanisad的另一bhasya的作者。特别是在苏雷斯瓦拉的瓦蒂卡身上，他大多被称为竞争对手的讨论者。(他也是前桑卡拉吠陀历史上的伟大人物，被称为jnanakarmasamuccayavadin。)由于他的任何著作都不在我们手中，无论是印刷形式还是手稿，都不可能依靠他自己的作品来重建他的哲学思想。收集从他人著作中找到的参考文献是进行程序的唯一可能方法。这位调查者计划制作苏雷斯瓦拉的《瓦蒂卡》的完整译本，并收集参考文献。在翻译同一本书时，调查员注意到阿南达吉里关于瓦蒂卡的评论SastRaprakasika提到了Bhartrprapanca的bhasya，并发现其中有许多提到Bhartrprapanca的思想。可以肯定的是，阿南达吉里在写《萨斯塔普拉卡西卡》时，手头也有同样的bhasya。因此，这位调查员决定寻找一份巴西亚的手稿，然而，尽管尽了一切努力，这位调查员还是没有找到一份手稿。此外，依靠零散的碎片重建婆罗帕潘卡的哲学思想也确实是一项艰巨的任务，因此仍在进行中。在这种情况下，报告中提及在Suresvara的Vartika中发现的Bhartrprapanca。较少

Sankara, the founder of Advaita Vedanta, of the 8th century is said to be the greatest philosopher ever produced in India. This is because his monism of the limitless Brahman is the pan-Hindu thought. Later Vedanta teachers stood out due to their uniquenesses (and those of their new schools) in fining differences from Sankara, though Hindu sects of religion in general have developed introducing Bhakti and Tantrism. This research of the post-Sankara History of religion has made a remarkable development in the last three decades. But the study of Sankara or pre-Sankara Vedanta has been rather neglected. Since Prof.H.Nakamura's The Development of Vedanta Philosophy (1955), we have only two treatises giving a general outlook of pre-Sankara Vedanta, i.e. S.L.Pandey's Pre-Sankara Advaita Philosophy, (pp.209-228, 1974) and A.J.Alston's (trans) The Method of the Vedanta (pp.213-259, 1989). Now the Brhadaranyakopanisad is among the most important Upanisads, as is known from its involving Mahava … More kyas like aham brahmasmi, tat tvam asi, and therefore Sankara's Bhasya and Suresvara's Vartika of the same are also regarded as important works.Bhartrprapanca is an antagonist of Advaita Vedanta and is the author of the other Bhasya of the Brhadaranyakopanisad. In Suresvara's Vartika in particular, he is mostly referred as a rival discussant. (He was also a great figure in the pre-Sankara Vedanta history and is known as jnanakarmasamuccayavadin.) Because none of his writings are in our hands either in printed form or in manuscripts, it has been impossible to reconstruct his philosophical thoughts taking recourse to his own works. Collecting references found in the writings of others is the only possible way to procedd.This investigator planned to produce a complete translation of Suresvara's Vartika and to collect references. While translating the same the investigator noticed that Sastraprakasika, the commentrary on the Vartika by Anandagiri, referred to Bhartrprapanca's Bhasya, and found that there were many references to Bhartrprapanca's ideas thoughts in it. It is certain that Anandagiri had the same Bhasya to hand while he was writing Sastraprakasika. Therefore this investigator decided to search out a manuscript of the Bhasya.However, despite every possible effort, this investigator could not discover a manuscript. Also the reconstruction of the philosophical thought of Bhartrprapanca depending on scattered fragments was really a mammoth task, and is therefore still under way. Under the circumstances references to Bhartrprapanca found in Suresvara's Vartika are herewith presented in the report. Less