The research on criminal justice in pre-modern Japan

根据传统的研究，德川幕府的刑事诉讼原则首先是选择原则，其次是认罪原则，最后是认罪原则。这一理论的结果是，所有的刑事案件都应该是有罪的。我的研究范围试图修改这一传统理论。长崎不二代法院有时会宣布一些人无罪。法院没有坚持认定被告人有罪，因此，前现代刑事诉讼程序中传统的审判程序总是产生有罪判决的形象应该得到改变。如果是这样，我们需要进行一项新的研究。当几乎总是通过有罪判决的系统…法官宣布99%的被告有罪…是在当代日本制造的吗？

According to the traditional research, the principles of the criminal procedure of Tokugawa Shogunate were made of, at first, the principle of selection, the second, the principle of laying stress on confession ,and the third, the principle of declaring guilty. The result of this theory was that all criminal cases should be guilty.My reach tried to modify this traditional theory. The court of Nagasaki Bugyo sometimes declared persons not guilty. The court did not persisted in finding the accused guilty, and therefore, the traditional image of criminal procedure in the pre-modern time that the inquisitorial procedure always produce the sentence of guilt, should be revised. If so, we need to make a new research. When the system of nearly always passing the sentence of guilt…Judge declare 99% of accused guilty…was made up in contemporary Japan?