Treatment Effect of Implant-supported Overdentures Using Magnetic and Bar Attachment : Functional Evaluation by Matching Test at Chair Side

·各种各样的植入物支持的覆盖物类型已经被开发为治疗受教育患者的前列腺治疗。如何，比较完整的牙科诊所中的治疗结果并没有被充分地测试过，因为口腔条件像牙科-支持的牙科诊所有不同的市场。以前，使用X射线CT和铸造测量方法评估了这些差异，但这些技术是复杂的，也不是广泛使用的。本研究比较了使用磁性和酒吧附件以及完整的牙科使用董事会侧功能评估图表来比较使用植入物支持的覆盖物的治疗结果，该图表由年龄、性、牙科使用的持续时间和牙科支持的tissue组成。有植入物支持的过量牙科的十名患者（IOD组，平均年龄： 60.8岁，性： 3名男子和7名妇女，牙科使用时间： 27.0个月）和35名完全牙科使用时间（平均年龄： 71.7岁，性： 15名男子和20名妇女，牙科使用时间： 38.1个月） ... More 在这个研究中。First， in both group， the chair-side functional evaluation charts were used to compare treatment outcomes in relation to （1） complete denture quality， （2） chewing function， and （3） overall satisfaction。下一个，10个主题（CD组）从35个完整的牙科患者中选出了与IOD组匹配的四个项目（年龄、性别、牙科使用的持续时间和牙科支持的疾病）。牙科支持的治疗方法得到了量化的评估（0-100），并附有测试协议。最后，CD和IOD组的这些分数用学生的T测试和Chi-squared测试进行了比较。ResultsDenture supporting tissue scores of the 35 complete denture patients and IOD Group were 36.6 vs.20.0 points。35个完整牙科患者的4个以上物品的平均适合性为70.1%，从35个完整牙科患者的CD组中选择的4个物品的平均适合性（平均年龄： 65.3岁，性别： 3名男子和7名妇女，牙科使用时间： 24.2个月，牙科支持组织评分：20.1分）和IOD组非常好（95.4%），总共有35名牙科患者的满意度得分，而且IOD组表示没有差异。IOD组高于CD组（67.3、38.5、54.7）的全部牙科质量评分（93.9）、咀嚼功能评分（77.0）和全部满意度评分（80.8） （P<0.05）。在本研究中，一项匹配测试包括对牙科支持的组织进行的评估，使其有可能与植入物支持的覆盖物使用磁性和酒吧附件进行比较，以获得与完整牙科相关的治疗结果。Furthermore，它清楚地表明，IOD集团的治疗结果比CD集团的那些高。Less（低）

・ObjectiveVarious types of implant-supported overdentures have been developed as prosthetic treatments for edentulous patients. However, comparison of the treatment outcomes among the complete dentures has not been sufficiently examined, because oral conditions such as denture-supporting tissues differ markedly. Previously, these differences were assessed using X-ray CT and cast measurements, but these techniques are complicated and not widely used.This study compared treatment outcomes of implant-supported overdentures using magnetic and bar attachment with complete dentures using chair-side functional evaluation charts by matching of age, sex, duration of denture usage, and denture-supporting tissues.・MethodsTen patients with implant-supported overdentures (IOD group, mean age : 60.8, sex : 3 men and 7 women, duration of denture usage : 27.0 months) and 35 patients with complete dentures (mean age : 71.7, sex : 15 men and 20 women, duration of denture usage : 38.1 months) participate … More d in this study. First, in both groups, the chair-side functional evaluation charts were used to compare treatment outcomes in relation to (1) complete denture quality, (2) chewing function, and (3) overall satisfaction. Next, ten subjects (CD Group) out of the 35 complete denture patients were selected who were matched for the four items (age, sex, duration of denture usage, and denture-supporting tissues) to the IOD Group. Denture-supporting tissues were quantitatively assessed (0-100) with an examination protocol. Lastly, these scores of CD and IOD groups were compared using the Student's t-test and chi-squared test.・ResultsDenture supporting tissue scores of the 35 complete denture patients and IOD Group were 36.6 vs. 20.0 points. The average fit for the above four items of the 35 complete denture patients and IOD Group was 70.1%.The average fit for the above four items of CD group selected from the 35 complete denture patients (mean age : 65.3, sex : 3 men and 7 women, duration of denture usage : 24.2 months and denture supporting tissue score : 20.1 points) and IOD Group was very good (95.4%).Overall satisfaction scores of the 35 complete denture patients and IOD Group indicated no difference. However, complete denture quality score (93.9), chewing function score (77.0), and overall satisfaction score (80.8) of the IOD Group were higher than those of the CD Group (67.3, 38.5, 54.7) (P<0.05).・ConclusionIn this study, the matching test including an assessment of denture supporting tissue made it possible to compare treatment outcomes of implant-supported overdentures using magnetic and bar attachment with complete dentures. Furthermore, it was clarified that treatment outcomes of the IOD Group were higher than those of the CD Group. Less