Medical economic analysis on the applicability and usefulness of restorations based on minimal intervention with adhesive materials

在临床实践中，基于最小干预的修复（MI修复）在非生命牙中的应用远远少于在生命牙中的应用。心肌梗死识别并没有导致心肌梗死修复体在非重要牙齿的临床应用增加，但在重要牙齿的病例中却有所增加。此外，限制临床使用MI修复体的因素包括对粘接材料的粘接性能和牙齿断裂的担忧。这些发现与被调查牙医毕业后的年数或住院时间之间没有很强的联系。

Restorations based on minimal intervention (MI restorations) were used much less in non-vital teeth than in vital teeth in clinical practice. MI recognition did not result in an increase in the clinical use of MI restorations for non-vital teeth, but did so for cases of vital teeth. Moreover, the factors limiting the clinical use of MI restorations in non-vital teeth included concerns about the adhesive properties of adhesive materials and tooth fracture. There was not a strong association between these findings and years of post-graduation or hospital sections of the dentists surveyed.