Cross sectional study about the formation of the Tale of Genji and the Tales of Ise(Fujiwara Teika' s edition)

《大岛》一书(日本古生物协会拥有)是修复《源氏物语》(藤原泰嘉S版)的最重要的书法。在这本大岛书中，有抄写到室町时期的书中常见的异读和汉字符号。我以为大岛的书不是《源氏物语》(藤原泰嘉的S版)写的。虽然大岛书是盛行于室町时期的书，但我推测它被《源氏物语》(藤原泰嘉的S版)改正了。同样，在《伊势记》中，同一系统的书籍之间，有许多共同的汉字符号，它获得了对某一事物的暗示。这是一次跨境审查的结果。我提到了《源氏物语》复本的特点，并考虑了这部《源氏物语》形成的历史。

The Oshima book(Possession of Paleological Association of Japan Inc.) is the most important calligraphy for restoring the Tale of Genji(Fujiwara Teika' s edition). In this Oshima book, there are the variant reading and the Chinese character notation which are common in the book copied down into the Muromachi period. I thought that the Oshima book was not written by the Tale of Genji(Fujiwara Teika' s edition). I presumed that it was corrected by the Tale of Genji(Fujiwara Teika' s edition), although the Oshima book was a book which was circulating at the Muromachi period. Also in Tales of Ise, between the books of the same system, there was much common Chinese character notation and it obtained the hint to a certain thing. This is a result of an examination across boundaries. I referred to the feature of the duplicate copy of Tales of Ise, and considered the history of this formation of the Tale of Genji.