A study on Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing's extraction and edition from the original text of Chun qiu zuo shi Zhuan and its mechanism of the production of Jing

Yoshinaga的这项研究提出了这样的假设：《春秋经》的原文是《春秋作石晶》，《春秋作石晶》的原文是从《春秋作诗传》原文中摘编而成的，除对《经文》的注释和引言部分外，目前基本上都收录在《春秋作诗传》的原文中。根据这一假设，我们可以将《春秋左传》的所有句子分析为四种句型：1从《左传》原文中摘录的句子类型，2从原文中摘编的句子类型，3编辑后的句子类型，4与《左传》文本不对应的句子类型。分析《春秋左传》石晶从殷公到文公的所有句子，摘录系统[类型一占23.9%，类型二占25.9%]占49.8%，版本系统[类型三占17.7%，类型四占32.5%]占50.2%。这一结果足以证明我的假设。此外，本研究还明确了《春秋左传》原文与《春秋左传》文本的关系，可以将石晶的原文与《春秋左传》原文与《春秋左传》原文、《春秋左传》文本的关系与《春秋左传》原文与《春秋左传》原文、《春秋左传》文本的关系与《资志·佟健》、《资志·佟健·冈穆》的关系进行比较。

This study by Yoshinaga has presented the hypothesis that the original text of Chun qiu Jing was Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing , and the text of Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing was made from the original text of Chun qiu Zuo shi Zhuan by the method of extraction and edition from the original text of Chun qiu Zuo shi Zhuan which is fundamentally included in the present text of Chun qiu Zuo shi Zhuan except the part of the explanation and introductory notes on the text of Jing. According to this hypothesis we can analyze all sentences of Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing to the four types of sentence : 1 the type of sentences extracted from the original text of Zuo shi Zhuan, 2 the type of sentences extractive edited from that, 3 the type of edited sentences, 4 the type of sentences without corresponding to the text of Zuo shi Zhuan. Analyzing the all sentences of Chun qiu Zuos shi Jing at the period from Yin gong till Wen gong, the extraction system [type1 is 23.9 percent and type2 is 25,9percent] accounts for 49.8 percentage, the edition system [type3 is 17.7percent and type4 is 32.5percent] accounts for 50.2 percentage. This result is able to be enough to prove my hypothesis. Furthermore this study made clear the relationship of the original text of Chun qiu Zuo shi Zhuan and the text of Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing is able to be compared with that of Zi zhi Tong jian and Zi zhi Tong jian Gang mu.