Licensing conditions of lexical conceptual expansion

在本研究中，我想主张，作为一般规则，论元名词比附属名词显示出更广泛的扩展指称，并且只有常规的扩展指称可用于名词。但因果关系的假设与这种概括背道而驰，因此我试图找出这种例外性的动机。与此同时，即使是因果范畴也符合概念扩展的常规情况所观察到的局部性的一般约束，这表明因果范畴的例外性只是表面的。

I would like to claim in this research that as a general rule argument nominals show a wider variety of expanded reference than adjunct nominals, and that only conventional expanded designations are available for adjuncts. But causal adjuncts run counter to this generalization, and therefore I try to identify the motivation for this exceptionality. At the same time, even causal adjuncts conform to the general constraint of locality which is observed by regular cases of conceptual expansion, and it shows that the exceptionality of causal adjuncts is only superficial.