Mobility, Connectivity and Identity of the Population in the Space between Eastern Carpathians and Dnieper. Archaeological studies on the later pre-Roman Iron Age.

个人、群体和社会的流动并不限于所谓的移徙时期，而是自古以来就伴随着人类的现象。人类的历史也是一部流动的历史。考古发现反映了区域不同清晰度的巨大动态和多样性。这一方面是由于发现的可能性，但另一方面也是由于研究情况本身和可用的方法。在某种程度上，可以清楚地认识到不同文化间的影响;然而，往往很难区分这种“重叠”。这样一幅画面是由迄今为止对东喀尔巴阡山脉和第聂伯河地区之间的地区在罗马前铁器时代后期进行的考古研究所传达的。在这里，可以追溯到几个考古群体，其年代学，地理学和社会地位没有充分研究他们的起源和与其他群体的联系。过去五到六十年的考古研究产生了丰富的考古材料。这为研究黑海西北部地区在罗马时代之前的各个方面的历史奠定了基础，并有助于绘制这一大片地区发生的过程的总体图，但也使解决某些问题成为可能-年表，发现的起源，人口的生活方式-这些人类社区的发展特征。与此同时，一些重要的问题，如黑海西北部地区前罗马时代晚期的精细年表，该地区的人类流动性，跨文化影响，身份等仍有待解决。通过对这两个项目的研究，使我意识到目前的研究迫切性，并促使我继续研究上述迄今被忽视的问题。这将主要通过检查这些社区的“服装”来完成。“服装”是指一个人有意识地选择的外在元素。从这个意义上说，服装的概念还包括人穿在身上的所有物品以及纺织品部件，即包括珠宝和可能的武器。在不同的外观特征中，对集体符号系统的个人参与和对该系统的个人实现的相互依赖变得明显，这是难以区分的，可以一起阅读作为自我表征的策略。

Mobility of individuals, groups and societies is a phenomenon that is not limited to the so-called migration period, but has accompanied mankind from time immemorial. The history of mankind is also a history of mobility. Archaeological finds reflect the great dynamics and diversity in regionally varying clarity. This is due on the one hand to the possibilities of discovery, but on the other hand also to the research situation itself and the available methods. In part, intercultural influences can be clearly recognized; however, it is often difficult to differentiate such "overlaps". Such a picture is conveyed by the archaeological research carried out so far for the region between the Eastern Carpathians and the Dnieper region in the later pre-Roman Iron Age. Here several archaeological groups can be traced, whose chronological, chorological and social position is not as sufficiently researched as their genesis and connectivity with other groups. The archaeological research of the last five to six decades has yielded a wealth of archaeological material. This forms the basis for the study of various aspects of the history of the northwestern Black Sea area in the later pre-Roman Iron Age and helps to draw a general picture of the processes that took place in this large area, but also makes it possible to work out certain problems - chronology, origin of finds, way of life of the population - that characterize the development of these human communities. At the same time, a number of important issues such as the fine chronology of the Late Pre-Roman Iron Age of the northwestern Black Sea area, human mobility in this area, cross-cultural influences, identity, etc. remain to be resolved. My research in the two projects has made me aware of the existing research desideratum and has prompted me to continue research on the above-mentioned questions, which have been rather ignored so far. This will be done primarily by examining the "clothing" of these communities. "Clothing" refers to the consciously chosen elements of a person's external appearance. In this sense, the concept of clothing also includes all objects that are worn on the body by a person together with the textile components, i.e. including jewelry and possibly weapons. In the different characteristics of the outer appearance, a mutual dependence on the personal participation in a collective sign system and on the individual realization of this system becomes apparent, which are difficult to distinguish and can be read together as a strategy of self-representation.