Legal Structure of the Optimal and Opened Regulation : Focusing on Law of Broadcasting

我们可以看到后冷战时代公共规制改革的几次尝试，追求的是最优性的增强，这一尝试本身也向公众开放。为了进行批判性的研究，准确地理解应该解决的问题，我试图分析在法律的改革之外形成的结构，以及迫使这些改革具有某些特征的结构。我可以找到迫使国家和社会制定和改善监管的结构，以秩序全球资本主义和保护自由民主。在结构上，我们试图使设备具有自我自动调节和调节规范内部化的过程。我们可以看到这些特点不仅在日本，而且在几个国家，因为这些都是跨国界的特点，并在全球范围内尝试。我可以找到上面提到的问题，但我需要讨论的多样性和结构中的行动者之间的相互作用的差异。这是一个微观层面的分析，但我不能完全讨论微观层面的问题。最后，我需要指出的是，这项研究是一个集中在广播法，因为上述问题似乎是代表在广播法。

We can see several experiments of the public regulations reform after post Cold War era ; enhancement of optimality has been pursued and this trial itself has been opened toward the public. In order to try a critical study and an exact understanding of problems which should be solved, I tried to analyze the structure that was formed outside of legal reforms and that forced these reforms to have some features. I could find the structure that forced states and societies to make and improve regulation for the purpose of ordering global capitalism and to protect liberal democracy. In the structure we have been tried to make the equipment that has the feature as the automatic regulation by self and the process to internalization of regulatory norms. We can see these characteristics not only in Japan but also in several countries because these are characteristics that cross the border and are tried globally. I could find the problem noted above, but I need to discuss on the diversity and the difference of interactivities among the actors in the structure. This is a micro level analysis, but I couldn' t discuss fully micro level problems. Finally I need to note here that this research was one focusing on law of broadcasting because problems noted above seemed to be represented on law of broadcasting.