Analysis of Dharmakirti's logic in the Pramanaviniscaya -- on the basis of Sanskrit manuscript of Dharmottara's commentary

为了理解达摩基提(公元600-660年)逻辑的特点，本文首先总结了他在《帕玛纳维尼斯卡亚》中的基本逻辑思想，其中他对迪尼亚加的逻辑作出了新的解释。此外，我根据达摩陀罗的梵文手稿来解释这一定义。将达摩吉提的逻辑研究应用到佛教哲学后来的发展中，我论述了两个瑜伽卡拉流派在萨哈瓦杰拉(11世纪)撰写的《立场摘要》中的立场和实践。此外，我还澄清了提出认知有形式的观点的瑜伽卡拉和主张认知没有形式的观点的瑜伽卡拉之间的理论差异。

In order to understand the characterisitc feature of the logic of Dharmakirti (c. 600-660), I first summarized his basic idea in logic in the Pramanaviniscaya (Determination of the means of cognition), in which he makes new interpretations of Dignaga's logic.In the present study, I focused on the elucidation of Dharmakirti's new interpretaions regarding the definition of thesis (paksa). Furthermore, I based the elucidation of this definition on the Sanskrit manuscript of Dharmottara's commentary.Applying the study of Dharmakirti's logic to later developments in Buddhist philosophy, I addressed the positions and practices of the two Yogacara school in the Sthitisamasa (Summary of positions) written by Sahajavajra (eleventh century). Furthermore, I clarified the theoretical differences between the Yogacaras who advovated the position that cognition has forms and the Yogacaras who advocated the position that cognition has no form.