Comparative Legal Study on using 'Lifelog' and the Protection of Privacy and Personal Data

本研究旨在通过对LifeLog数据使用中隐私和个人数据保护的比较研究，阐明隐私权的本质。在此基础上，提出以下四点建议：(1)由于理论问题无法解决，所谓的个人数据财产权不能被确立为一项独立的权利，但其使用个人数据的财产维度可以通过合同来解决；(2)隐私权的重要因素包括消费者的选择和透明度，(3)侧写问题应作为侵犯隐私行为的新维度之一予以关注。(4)关于隐私和个人数据保护的讨论往往会回到隐私的被动性质，如美国的“不追踪”或欧盟的“被遗忘权”，因为它们不起到个人对个人数据的主动控制的作用。

This research is aimed at clarifying the essence of right of privacy through comparative studies on the protection of privacy and personal data in using lifelog data.Based on the above research, the following four suggestions have been made: (1) the so-called 'right of property' of personal data can't be established as an independent right because theoretical problems can't be solved, but its property dimension of using personal data can be solved through contracts, (2)important factors of the right of privacy consist of consumer's choice and transparency, (3) the problem of 'profiling' should be paid attention as one of the new dimensions of privacy infringements, (4) discussions on the protection of privacy and personal data tend to go back to the passive nature of privacy such as the 'Do Not Track' in the United States or the 'right to be forgotten' in the European Union, as they don't function as active controlling of personal data by individuals.