课题基金 / 基金详情

Advanced Training in Intensive Livestock Health and Production

Advanced Training in Intensive Livestock Health and Production
集约化畜牧健康和生产高级培训
批准号:
BB/I024313/1
负责人:
Stephen May
金额:
$370.43万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2011
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2011 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
广泛的自由贸易、高效的国际运输、知识和技术传播、资源和劳动力成本以及立法负担使集约化畜牧业(猪和家禽)具有极强的竞争力。经合组织国家对养猪生产的补贴平均达到农场价值的23%,而英国生产商却无法获得这一补贴,这加大了竞争压力。尽管大型高效的养猪和家禽业,英国在肉鸡和猪肉生产方面的贸易平衡为负(DEFRA 2007, 2008)。竞争压力和技术进步推动了生产效率的显著提高。例如,在肉鸡生产中,日增重增加了一倍,从1970年的30克/天(g/d)增加到2003年的60克/天,同期食物转化效率(每公斤活增重公斤饲料)从2.3提高到1.8。生产力的提高主要与遗传改良、营养改善和疾病控制方面的巨大进步有关,而这些又使集约化程度提高,从而提高了生产效率。由于许多直截了当的问题已经找到了解决办法,而且现在需要技术上更复杂的创新,因此改进的速度已经放缓。为了满足预计的人口增长和动物蛋白消费量的增加(到2030年将翻一番),需要在全球范围内进一步提高生产力。发展中国家的繁荣和社会变化威胁着英国的粮食安全,在历史上,当国内生产不足时,英国的粮食安全一直是通过进口来保证的。随着产量的增加,增加“足迹”(淡水消耗、温室气体排放和土壤退化)在环境上是不可取的。在经济现实、商业效率和道德约束的背景下,一支能够整合从生产动物DNA到消费者饮食的知识和理解的劳动力将为畜牧业提供最好的服务。在英国,为集约化畜牧生产提供的兽医和相关科学技能日益短缺。这对英国的食品安全构成了真正的结构性威胁,并导致英国缺乏经济竞争力。在英国,只有3.8%的兽医专门从事生产动物实践,由此推断,从事集约化畜牧生产的比例更小(2010年RCVS调查)。虽然兽医具备应对食用动物面临的重大挑战的全面能力,但他们没有接受作为家畜兽医有效运作所需的高度专业化培训。目前,持有家禽和猪医学专业文凭的兽医分别在英国排名第6位和第12位(2009年RCVS登记),其中72%的兽医在1987年之前获得了文凭,这表明人口老龄化。目前在英国的欧洲大学外交官只有8名,在相应的家禽科学学院只有6名欧洲外交官,这反映了欧洲大陆的技能短缺。美国也存在类似的短缺。此外,很少有具有鸡和猪生物学专业知识的基础或应用科学家,并且对陆基研究提供的审查(HEFCE 2007)确定了从事畜牧生产课程的学生的缺乏。支持的理由是:尽管养猪业和家禽业效率很高,但英国在养猪业和家禽业产品方面的贸易逆差为负。要保持竞争力、促进全球消费、确保英国食品安全和减少对环境的影响,就需要大幅提高生产率。从DNA到饮食,需要全面的专业知识来支持这个行业。有一小部分熟练的兽医和科学家在支持这个行业。
英文摘要
Extensive free trade, efficient International transportation, knowledge and technology dissemination, resource and workforce costs and legislative burden make the intensive livestock (pigs and poultry) industries searingly competitive. A subsidy for pig production amounting to 23% of value at farmgate averaged across OECD countries which is not available to UK producers exerts increased competitive pressure. Despite large efficient pig and poultry industries the UK has a negative trade balance in both broiler and pig meat production (DEFRA 2007, 2008). Competitive pressure and technological progress have driven remarkable improvements in production efficiency. For instance in broiler production daily weight gain doubled, from 30 grammes per day (g/d) in 1970 to 60 g/d in 2003 and food conversion efficiency (kilogrammes (kg) feed per kg live weight gain) improved from 2.3 to 1.8 over the same period. Productivity gains have been primarily associated with genetic improvement, better nutrition and dramatic advances in disease control which in turn have permitted greater intensification and thus production efficiency. The rate of improvement has slowed as solutions have been found to many straightforward problems and a requirement now exists for more technologically sophisticated innovation. A further step-change in productivity will be required on a global scale to meet the predicted population growth and increased consumption of animal protein which is set to double by 2030. The improved prosperity and social changes in developing countries threaten UK food security which historically has been assured by importation when internal production is inadequate. It is environmentally undesirable to increase the 'footprint' (fresh water consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and soil degradation) as production increases. The livestock industry will be best served by a workforce capable of integrating knowledge and understanding from the DNA of the production animal to the diet of the consumer and in the context of economic reality, business efficiency and ethical constraint. There is a growing shortage of veterinary and associated scientific skills provision for intensive livestock production in the UK. This presents a real, structural danger to UK food security and is contributing to lack of economic competitiveness. Only 3.8% of veterinarians in the UK work in exclusively production animal practice and by inference a smaller proportion work in intensive livestock production (RCVS survey 2010). Whilst veterinarians qualify with an all round ability to deal with the major challenges that arise with food animals, they do not receive the highly specialised training required to operate effectively as intensive livestock veterinarians. Currently veterinarians holding specialist diplomas in poultry and pig medicine in the UK number 6 and 12 respectively (RCVS Register 2009) and of these 72% acquired their diplomas before 1987, suggesting an ageing population. Only 8 UK based European college diplomats exist and there are only 6 European diplomats in the corresponding poultry science college, reflecting the skills shortage in mainland Europe. A similar shortage exists in the USA. Furthermore there are few basic or applied scientists with specialised knowledge of chicken and pig biology and a review of provision for Land Based Studies (HEFCE 2007) identified the paucity of students engaged in courses on livestock production. The case for support is that: Despite an efficient pig and poultry industry the UK has a negative trade balance in pig and poultry products. Substantial improvements in productivity will be required to remain competitive, to contribute to global consumption, to ensure UK food security and to reduce environmental impact. Holistic expertise will be required from DNA to diet to support the industry. There is a small declining cadre of skilled veterinarians and scientists supporting the sector.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金