DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION--A LIFE LONG COURSE PERSPECTIVE II

谈论酒精和毒品..。在希腊人中，生活方式风险 由预防研究所(PRI)制定的减排计划 肯塔基州列克星敦专注于4种毒品：酒精、尼古丁、大麻和 可卡因。这一由同行领导的预防计划已被一家 由4个希腊组织组成的联盟(2个兄弟会(Delta Tau Delta和 Phi Gamma Delta)和2个女生联谊会(Alpha chi Omega和Kappa Alpha Theta)。每个人都将有本科生和校友团队接受培训 将课程提供给校园内的所有分会成员，所有4名成员 各组织都有代表。这些指导团队会收到一份 为期三天(32小时)的强化培训，为他们提供 8-10小时，一天的课程和后续联合助推器 他们分会的会员资格。努力探索差异化 有效性，各组织将其所有分会的评级为 在分会领导方面，杰出、良好和可接受的， 承诺、是否遵守与饮酒/毒品有关的纪律 行为。将从符合以下条件的学生中随机抽取校园样本 所有4个组织都出席了。在每个被选入 样本(代表美国所有4个地区)，1个兄弟会和1个 女生联谊会将被选为对照组。这将是一辆5 一年的纵向跟踪研究(连续入选的以及 辍学生)与队列顺序设计组件一起学习新的 新生班级。 两个小的方法论研究被嵌入以评估比较 影响：1)不同的目标人群(来自天主教的学生， 黑人和小型文科学校)；2)不同的递送代理 (程序开发人员与同行团队)。

Talking About Alcohol and Drugs ... Among Greeks, a Lifestyle Risk Reduction program developed by the Prevention Research Institute (PRI) of Lexington, KY focuses on 4 drugs: alcohol, nicotine, marijuana and cocaine. This peer-led prevention program has been adopted by a consortium of 4 Greek organizations (2 fraternities (Delta Tau Delta and Phi Gamma Delta) and 2 sororities (Alpha Chi Omega and Kappa Alpha Theta). Each will have teams of undergraduates and alumni trained to deliver the course to all chapter members on campuses where all 4 organizations are represented. These instructional teams receive an intensive, three day (32 hours) training to prepare them to deliver the 8-10 hour, one day course and follow-up booster to the combined membership of their chapters. In an effort to explore differential effectiveness, the organizations will rate all their chapters as outstanding, good and acceptable, in terms of chapter leadership, commitment, and presence or absence of drinking/drug related disciplinary actions. A sample of campuses will be drawn randomly from those having all 4 organizations present. On each of the campuses selected into the sample (representing all 4 regions of the US), 1 fraternity and 1 sorority will be selected to serve as control groups. This will be a 5 year longitudinal followup study (those continuously enrolled as well as dropouts) with a cohort sequential design component to pick up new classes of freshmen. Two small methodological studies are embedded to evaluate comparative impact with: 1) different target populations (students from Catholic, black, and small liberal arts schools); 2) different delivery agents (program developers vs. peer teams).