How did the 2012 ceasefire&economic liberalisation period of 2011-2018 shape new forms of structural violence&resistance in rural southeast Myanmar?

这项研究将探索缅甸东南部农村人民在武装冲突和军事统治最黑暗的日子里为减轻国家领导的统治而采取的战略是如何演变的，以抵制经济自由化和停火引发的新形式的结构性暴力。我将开发一个分析框架，将提供一些概念，用来a)描述缅甸政府暴力的形式和关键动力，以及b)解释那些遭受国家权力暴力表现的人的个人行为和抵抗模式。这项研究将阻力引入冲突或冲突后背景下具有挑战性的结构性暴力的讨论中，从而为和平研究文献做出了贡献。结构性暴力通常被划分为可以平方处理的“地方政治”。这项研究的数据收集基于当地人权组织发布的现有数据--包括匿名转录的采访、最新情况和缅甸东南部村民的证词。虽然内容分析将是主要的数据收集方法，但也可以采访在缅甸东南部社区和民间社会工作但目前设在泰国的关键线人。我将保留这种实地考察方法的可能性，作为一种选择，以便在需要时对其中一些数据进行三角测量、澄清和丰富。

This research will explore how the strategies employed by rural people in southeast Myanmar to mitigate state-led domination during the darkest days of armed conflict and military rule evolved to resist new forms of structural violence catalysed by economic liberalisation and ceasefire. I will develop an analytical framework will provide concepts with which to a) describe the form and key dynamics of the violence of the Myanmar state, and b) to explain the individual acts and patterns of resistance of those that suffer from the violent manifestations of this state power. The research contributes to the peace studies literature by bringing resistance into the discussion of challenging structural violence in conflict or post-conflict contexts, which is often compartmentalised as 'local politics' that can be squared away . The data collection for this research is based on already-existing data published by a local human rights organisation - including anonymised transcribed interviews, situation updates and testimony from villagers in southeast Myanmar. While content analysis will be the primary data collection method, there is scope for interviews with key informants working in communities and civil society in the southeast of Myanmar, but currently based in Thailand. I will keep the possibility of this fieldwork method open as an option in order to triangulate, clarify and enrich some of this data if needed.