From Deviant to Domestic: A diachronic corpus-based critical discourse analysis of LGBTQI representation in the Times between 1957-2017

这个跨学科的项目有助于女同性恋，男同性恋，双性恋，变性人，酷儿和双性人（LGBTQI）的人在英国的历史研究，通过映射如何酷儿身份和社区已在英国媒体的代表，以及如何性别身份的语言已经改变。该方法将语言学与历史研究、后结构主义语篇理论和文化研究相结合，为基于语料库的批评性语篇分析做出贡献。调查结果不仅将在学术界作出宝贵的贡献，而且还将通过对LGBT历史月（LGBTHM）和英国学校的贡献扩展到公共领域。这将以两种方式发生。首先，英国学校的主席提供了关于LGBTQI历史上特定时刻的主流代表性的问题（桑德斯，2018）。其次，这项研究的成果将与LGBTHM和英国的学校分享，以帮助扩大对LGBTQI历史的历史理解，而LGBTHM学校的课程和活动正是基于这一历史理解。通过扩大我们对语言历史的理解，我们可以提供对英国LGBTQI人历史的更准确和交叉的理解。该项目将花费6年的时间，回答以下问题：-英国媒体如何使用语言来表达与LGBTQI人群相关的身份和社区概念？在1957-2017年之间，这些表述发生了哪些变化？这种陈述对不同类型的LGBTQI人群有什么潜在后果？

This interdisciplinary project contributes to the historical study of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI) people in the UK by mapping how queer identities and communities have been represented in the British press as well as how the language of sexual identity has changed. The methodology will contribute to the field of corpus-based critical discourse analysis (CDA) by integrating linguistics with historical research, poststructuralist discourse theory, and cultural studies. The findings will not only make a valuable contribution in academia but will also be extended to the public sphere through a contribution to LGBT History Month (LGBTHM) and Schools Out UK. This will occur in two ways. First, the chair of Schools OUT UK has provided questions regarding the mainstream representation of particular moments in LGBTQI history (Sanders, 2018). Secondly, the outcomes of this study will be shared with LGBTHM and Schools OUT UK in order to help broaden the historical understanding of LGBTQI history upon which the events and LGBTHM school curriculum are based. By broadening our understanding of language historically, we can provide for a more accurate and intersectionalunderstanding of the history of LGBTQI people in the UK. The project will take 6 years part-time and answer thefollowing questions:- How does the British press use language to discursively represent the concept of identity and communityas they relate to LGBTQI people?- In what ways have such representations changed between 1957-2017?- What are the potential consequences of such representations for different types of LGBTQI people?