The reception of Celsus' 'De medicina' from the middle ages to the modern era

我的项目地址的接收Celsus'德medicina，其中包括八本书希波克拉底医学是写在第一个世纪的广告。它的传统涉及从古代到现代的医学史。我将集中在塞尔苏斯文本传播的主要步骤，以解释不同的解读和它被用于的不同目的。通过研究世纪在Nonantola复制的手稿，我将解决修道院抄写室的作用，我将提供中世纪医学知识和书籍制作的见解。15世纪的佛罗伦萨是德medicina历史上的另一个关键步骤，因为它是在1478年首次印刷。佛罗伦萨学术界的成员们比较了手稿样本，并就主版本的语言学准确性和塞尔苏斯的身份进行了辩论。除了探讨人文主义者和医生在印刷厂中的作用外，我的项目还将通过考虑书籍的物质传播，书信通信和口头交流，为印刷医学知识的流通提供新的见解。世纪，《医学》的读者们对《医学》的医学和外科学内容给予了高度重视，博学的医学界对《医学》进行了哲学阐释。为了解决这个问题，我将集中在帕多瓦和博洛尼亚医学竞技场的几个重要作者的作品，即Falloppio，Malpighi和Morgagni。

My project addresses the reception of Celsus' De medicina, which consists in eight book on Hippocratic medicine thatwere written in Latin in the first century AD. Its tradition concerns the history of medicine from antiquity to the modern era.I will focus on the main steps in the transmission of Celsus' text to explain different readings and the different purposes itwas employed for. By examining the manuscripts copied in Nonantola in the ninth and tenth century, I will address therole of monastic scriptoria and I will provide insights on medieval medical knowledge and bookmaking. Fifteenth-centuryFlorence is another crucial step in De medicina's history, as it was printed there for the first time in 1478. The membersof the Florentine Academia compared manuscript exemplars and debated on the editio princeps' philological accuracyand Celsus' identity. In addition to exploring the role of humanists and physicians in the printing house, my project willshed new light on the circulation of printed medical knowledge by taking into consideration the material spread of books,epistolary correspondence, and oral communication. In the sixteenth and seventeenth century, readers of De medicinahighlighted its medical and surgical contents and erudite medical circles fostered philosophical interpretations. Toaddress this themes, I will focus on the works of a few important authors in the Paduan and Bolognese medical arena,namely Falloppio, Malpighi, and Morgagni.