Differential Impact of HIV Intervention on Native Youth

描述（由申请人提供）：对性冒险的早期决策的投资往往具有终身利益，对少数群体的青年可能特别重要。美国印第安人（AI）青年的衣原体感染率几乎是全国人口的两倍，即使在最年轻的年龄（10-14岁），占所有AI艾滋病病例的21%。艾滋病/艾滋病毒病例数量虽少但不断增加，加上性传播疾病发病率很高，这就迫切需要在这些社区进行有效预防。然而，往往没有对针对青年的艾滋病毒/性传播疾病预防工作进行有意义的评价，设计严谨的评价结果也不明确。在某种程度上，不确定的结果可能是由于缺乏整合的理论框架的干预效果的分析：很少有占诱发因素或发展轨迹，可能会减少干预的效果。简而言之，青年对同样的干预措施可能有不同的反应。该项目将评估艾滋病毒预防干预课程的影响，该课程是与人工智能社区的15所中学合作，专门为人工智能中学青年设计的。使用社会认知理论作为框架，我们还可以解释社会背景和先前的发展轨迹。这种对结果的背景化解释在人工智能保留社区可能特别重要，其中许多社区即使在家庭和文化生活很强的情况下，也承受着高水平的发病率，创伤和贫困。此外，大多数针对青年的预防方案都以城市青年为重点。我们对文化上适当的干预措施如何在农村环境中对人工智能青年起作用知之甚少。该项目有四个目标：[1]评估干预措施对人工智能青少年样本中性风险知识、预期和行为（KEB）的影响; [2]确定干预措施对该青少年样本中性风险和KEB的发展轨迹的影响，以及干预措施的不同暴露水平对这些轨迹的影响。[3]根据最初的风险状况、家庭和社区背景以及一段时间内的风险模式，在理论上确定青年的突出分组，并确定干预措施对不同群体的影响程度;[4]在与教育工作者、社区成员和青年的协商反馈会议上，为人工智能青年制定性风险干预的“最佳实践”模型。

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Investments in early decision-making about sexual risk-taking often have lifetime benefits and may be especially important for youth of minority groups. American Indian (AI) youth have almost twice the rate of chlamydia found in the national population, even at the youngest ages (10-14), and represent 21% of all AI AIDS cases. The low but rising numbers of AIDS/HIV cases in combination with high rates of STDs support the pressing need for effective prevention in these communities. Meaningful evaluation of HIV/STD prevention efforts aimed at youth, however, is often absent, and the results of those with rigorous designs have been ambiguous. In part, the uncertain findings may be explained by the lack of integration of theoretical frameworks into the analyses of intervention effectiveness: Few have accounted for predisposing factors or developmental trajectories that may diminish the effects of an intervention. In short, youth are likely to respond differently to the same intervention. This project will assess the impact of an HIV prevention intervention curriculum designed explicitly for AI middle-school youth in partnership with 15 middle schools in an AI community. Using Social Cognitive Theory as a framework, we can also account for social context and prior developmental trajectories. Such contextualized interpretation of results is likely to be particularly important in AI reservation communities, many of which endure high levels of morbidity, trauma, and poverty, even while family and cultural life are strong. Furthermore, most prevention programs for youth have focused on urban youth. We know little about how culturally appropriate interventions might work with AI youth in rural settings. The project has four aims: [1] To assess the impact of the intervention on sexual-risk knowledge, expectancies, and behaviors (KEBs) among a sample of AI youth; [2] to determine the impact of the intervention on developmental trajectories of sexual risk and KEBs in this sample of youth, and the effect of varying exposure levels of the intervention on those trajectories; [3] to develop theoretically salient groupings of youth based on initial risk status, family and community context, and risk patterns over time, and to determine the extent to which the impact of the intervention varies by group; and [4] to develop a "best practices" model of sexual risk intervention for AI youth in consultative feedback sessions with educators, community members, and youth.