How do states shape Global Production Networks?

比较国家发展战略及其对越南和孟加拉国服装业的影响。该项目因此比较了孟加拉国和越南服装业的演变。这些国家体现了截然不同的国家形式--市场自由主义和威权发展主义--它们采取了截然不同的发展战略，成为继中国之后最大的服装和纺织品制造商。然而，它们在全球生产网络中占据着非常不同的地位：越南有一个更一体化的行业，具有更高的生产率、劳动力成本和外国资本渗透率；孟加拉国有一个分散的行业，劳动力成本低，生产率高，而且主要是由国内所有(Buckley，2021)。他们的比较研究将解决以下问题：1.为什么越南和孟加拉国采取不同的战略来整合其全球纺织业，这如何影响它们在全球纺织网络中的地位？2.国家的组成及其与国内社会力量之间的竞争模式如何影响全球纺织网络一体化的性质？3.这些过程告诉我们关于不同类型的国家如何在全球纺织网络中升级，资本主义国家在发展中国家的性质，以及更广泛的全球价值链文献中国家的作用？

Comparing state developmental strategies and their impact on the Vietnamese and Bangladeshi garment industries.This project consequently compares the evolution of the Bangladeshi and Vietnamese garment sectors. These nations embody distinct state forms - market-liberal vs authoritarian-developmental - and have pursued markedly different developmental strategies to become the largest garment and textile manufacturers after China. However, they occupy very different positions within GPNs: Vietnam has a more integrated industry with higher productivity, labour costs and penetration of foreign capital; Bangladesh has a fragmented industry, with low labour costs, productivity and which is largely domestically owned (Buckley, 2021). Their comparative study will allow the following questions to be addressed:1. Why have Vietnam and Bangladesh pursued divergent strategies to integrate their textile sectors globally, and how has this shaped their respective positions within GPNs?2. How has the composition of the state, and patterns of contestation between it and domestic social forces, influenced the nature of GPN integration?3. What do these processes tell us about how different types of states upgrade within GPNs, the nature of the capitalist state in developing countries, and the role of the state within GVC literatures more broadly?