Fostering generational cooperation between Generation Z and Generations X & Y on water security - a common global concern of humankind, cooperative so

该研究将从全球公民的角度，特别是在相互关联的新兴全球挑战（如国际安全、粮食安全、能源安全和环境安全）的背景下，挑战国家主权、军事安全方法范围内的全球水安全问题。水安全的全球环境维度没有得到整合，主权不再能够为淡水法提供主要基础（Grey & Garrick 2013:3, Magsig, 2017: 388），因此，根据经济合作与发展组织（OECD）的基线环境展望（OECD, 2012 in (Garrick and Hall, 2014: 611)），到2050年，预计将有近40亿人生活在严重缺水的流域。全球80%的人口生活在水安全面临高度威胁的地区（Vorosmarty CJ et al. 2010 in Garrik and Hall, 2014:611）“国内和国际水法和政策都不足以应对这一全球现象带来的挑战，也不足以适应似乎不可避免的额外后果”（Eckstein, 2009:412）。为了立即重新制定国际法，需要以下框架含义：-对水和环境采取非国家侵入性方法-金融家决心在水方面投资数万亿美元。-全球公开辩论加速这一进程。上述方法需要大量的说服力，包括对集体安全的演变性质和国际水法的[修订]作用的审查（Magsig 2011: 343; Magsig 2015: 139）。因此，迫切需要说服更广泛的公众参与（Z世代，X世代和Y世代）在水安全辩论中，这在21世纪“今天已经变得紧迫，因为政策制定者（联合国安理会，八国集团，北约）和金融家（世界银行，国际货币基金组织和世界贸易组织）在水安全危机与[国际和平]和气候变化相关时忽视了跨学科奖学金的紧急呼吁”（Cullet et al.2021:13）。在气候变化等具有挑战性的问题上，将辩论转向正确方向的能力，显然在格蕾塔·桑伯格的环境抗议活动中很普遍。

The research will challenge the global water security issues confined within state-sovereignty, military security approach from the perspectives of global citizens in particular cohorts of Gen Z X and Y in the context of interlinked emerging global challenges, such as international security, food security, energy security and environment security. The global environment dimensions of water security are not integrated, and sovereignty is no longer capable of providing the primary foundation for freshwater law (Grey & Garrick 2013:3, Magsig, 2017: 388) as a result almost 4 billion people are projected to live in severely water-stressed basins by 2050 according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)'s baseline environmental outlook (OECD, 2012 in (Garrick and Hall, 2014: 611). Eighty percent of the global population lives in regions experiencing high threats to water security (Vorosmarty CJ et al. 2010 in Garrik and Hall, 2014:611) 'Both domestic and international water laws and policies are inadequate to meet the challenges posed by this global phenomenon or to adapt to the additional consequences that appear to be inevitable' (Eckstein, 2009:412). For immediate reformulation of international law requires the following framework implications:-Non-state invasive approach to water and environment-Financiers' determination to invest trillions in water.-A global public debate to hasten the process. These above approaches require a great deal of convincing, including an examination of the evolving nature of collective security and the [revised]role of international water law (Magsig 2011: 343; Magsig 2015: 139). Therefore, there is an urgent need of convincing wider public participation(Gen Z, X and Y) in water security debates which in this 21st century 'has become urgent today in regard to the extent to which the policy makers (The UN security council, G8, NATO) and financiers(WB, IMF and WTO) are ignoring the urgent call from the transdisciplinary scholarships when the water security crises linked to [international peace] and climate change'(Cullet et al.2021:13). The ability to shift debates in the right direction on challenging issues i.e., climate change is evidently prevalent in Greta Thunberg's environmental protest.