PLATFORM: Decentralised polygeneration of energy: Cross-disciplinary research at Imperial College London

电力行业的私有制意味着大规模投资往往不如建设时间短的小型模块化发电吸引人。这种小型、“分散”发电的新兴技术也使电力供应商能够在使用点附近生产电力（而不是像许多传统的大规模发电站那样靠近燃料源），减少了长距离电力传输的损耗，减少了加强电力传输网络的成本，并改善了电力和热量的“联合发电”的机会，在家庭和企业中使用“废”热。热电联产和其他效率的提高减少了与能源系统相关的环境排放，并有助于向低碳经济发展。新的、更清洁的、能够在小规模下以高效率运行的发电技术具有很大的前景，但它们的发展以及与现有电力系统的整合带来了新的技术、运营、经济和监管挑战。最初的平台赠款在帝国理工学院伦敦作出了重要贡献的关键分散能源系统的选择的理解，并已帮助建立这个领域成为一个现在吸引了英国和国际研究和政策更大的兴趣。对于更新的程序，我们建议发展我们的方法，通过集中在新兴的概念“多联产”能源系统。多联产描述了多种能源产品的联合生产-超越了热电联产。最令人兴奋的概念涉及生产能源产品，为“固定”电力/热力和运输市场服务，在这两个传统上分离的能源系统之间建立新的联系。固定能源市场与运输能源市场之间的联系可以大大提高能源转换设备的使用时间百分比，并有助于消除能源需求随时间的正常波动。有机会微调产出组合以配合需求和/或产品价格的变化，并有能力使用各种资源投入，对经营者、更广泛的能源系统和整个社会都有潜在的经济利益。多联产系统可使用各种化石和可再生能源（如天然气、煤炭、生物质和废物），利用各种能源转换技术（包括气化和热解），并生产各种产品（包括电力和供热/制冷、气体和液体）。工厂的规模也可能有所不同，从非常大的集中式能源站到位于城市地区的小型装置。通过“多尺度”和供应链建模的结合，该计划将研究多联产的选择，潜在关键系统的特性，它们与能源市场和更广泛的供应链的联系。推动这项研究的问题包括：什么应该从一个地方转移到另一个地方--初级资源、加工燃料、电力甚至技术？相对效益是什么（如经济、社会、环境、稳健性等）集中式和分散式系统的区别？从目前的基础设施到未来的基础设施，有哪些替代迁移路径可以满足不同的社会需求？替代配置的性能特征是什么？供应链如何实现脱碳？

Private ownership of the electricity industry means large scale investments are often less attractive than smaller, modular generation with rapid construction times. Emerging technologies for such smaller, 'decentralised', electricity generation also allows power providers to produce electricity near to the point of use (rather than near the source of fuel as for many conventional large scale power stations), with reduced losses in long distance transmission of power, reduced costs in reinforcing the power transmission network, and improved opportunities for 'co-generation' of power and heat, with the use of 'waste' heat in homes and businesses. Cogeneration and other efficiency improvements reduce the environmental emissions associated with the energy system, and can help the movement towards a lower carbon economy.New, cleaner, electricity generation technologies capable of operating at high efficiencies at small sizes offer great promise, but their development, and integration with the existing power system, pose new technological, operational, economic and regulatory challenges. The original Platform Grant at Imperial College London has made important contributions to the understanding of key decentralised energy system options, and has helped build this field into one now attracting much greater interest in UK and international research and policy.For the renewed programme, we propose to develop our approaches through a focus on the emerging concepts for `polygeneration' energy systems. Polygeneration describes the combined production of multiple energy products - moving beyond cogeneration of heat and power. The most exciting concepts involve production of energy products to serve both `stationary' power/heat and transport markets, creating novel linkages between these two traditionally separate energy systems. Linkage between stationary and transport energy markets can provide dramatic improvements in the percentage of time the energy conversion equipment is in use, and help to smooth out the normal fluctuations in demand for energy over time. The opportunity to fine-tune the mix of outputs to match changes in demand and/or product prices, and the ability to use a wide variety of resource inputs, has potential economic benefits to the operator, the wider energy system and society at large. Polygeneration systems may use a wide range of fossil and renewable energy sources (such as gas, coal, biomass and wastes), utilise a variety of energy conversion technologies (including gasification and pyrolysis) and produce a range of products (including electricity and heat/cooling, gases and liquids). The scale of the plant can also vary, from very large centralised energy stations to small installations located within urban areas.Through a combination of 'multi-scale' and supply chain modelling, the programme will investigate the options for polygeneration, characteristics of potentially key systems, their linkage into energy markets and the wider supply chain. Questions which will drive the research include: What should be moved from place to place - primary resources, processed fuels, electricity or even technologies?; What are the relative benefits (e.g. economic, social, environmental, robustness etc.) of centralised and de-centralised systems?; What alternative migration paths are there from the current infrastructure to future infrastructures that will meet varied societal needs? What are the performance characteristics of alternative configurations? How can the supply chain be decarbonised?