Planning and Evaluation Core

摘要|规划与评估核心(PEC) 庞塞健康科学大学-莫菲特癌症中心的规划和评估核心(PEC) (PHSU-MCC)伙伴关系监测和评估落实目标的进展情况，并 伙伴关系所有领域的目标，包括研究、教育和社区外展。PEC 作为问责的中心节点，并确保伙伴关系正在完成拟议的目标和 通过其评价框架实现各项目标。PEC评估过程考虑到了行政核心 (Ac)最大限度地利用资源，确定伙伴关系的新方向，并报告伙伴关系的进展 核心和研究人员交给机构领导人和国家癌症研究所(NCI)。PEC坚持认为 支持战略规划、监测和评估伙伴关系的内部和外部咨询小组 通过评估目标、活动、产出和预期结果之间的关系来开展活动。两个人 PEC的基本咨询小组是内部咨询委员会(IAC)和方案指导委员会 (PSC)。IAC和PSC在PEC内部密切合作，为以下方面提供指导和建议 空调。PEC为每个合作伙伴组件建立逻辑模型，并提供持续更新以 反映伙伴关系的新目标、新活动和新发展。PEC，与量化研究所合作 Science Core(QSC)，实施了使用RedCap来跟踪赠款和出版物(包括期刊影响 因素)由伙伴关系研究人员提交和获得，以简化跟踪。PEC是以下组织的成员 推进癌症健康公平评估者特别兴趣小组(PACHE SIG)的伙伴关系，该小组正在工作 为评价国家一级的亚太环发基金方案确定共同要素。PEC将在 具有必要的灵活性以适应和响应新出现的挑战、创新和 事态的发展。PEC的具体目标是：1)协调收集、跟踪和分析评价 伙伴关系组成部分、进程和活动的数据。这为AC提供了以下所需的关键数据 发起、终止或修改新的和正在进行的计划，以实现伙伴关系的目标和目的。这个 PEC整合了逻辑模型、用于跟踪结果的基于Web的关系数据系统和年度 合作伙伴成员调查，以监控和评估沟通、互动和 这两个机构的伙伴关系组成部分之间/之间的整合。2)进行内部评估 通过机构间咨询委员会的活动组成伙伴关系。IAC将审查以下项目的季度进度报告 核心和研究项目，并提供总结性反馈。IAC还将与AC合作，以征求 并评估新的研究项目。3)通过以下途径对伙伴关系组成部分进行外部评价 方案支助委员会和一名外部评价顾问的活动。PSC提供公正、严谨和专业的 每年对伙伴关系的进展情况进行评价，并在整个赠款过程中提出改进建议 每季度与审计委员会举行一次会议。

ABSTRACT | PLANNING AND EVALUATION CORE (PEC) The Planning and Evaluation Core (PEC) of the Ponce Health Sciences University-Moffitt Cancer Center (PHSU-MCC) Partnership monitors and evaluates progress toward the implementation of the goals and objectives of the Partnership across all areas including research, education, and community outreach. The PEC serves as a central node for accountability and ensures that the Partnership is completing proposed aims and objectives through its evaluative framework. The PEC evaluation processes allow for the Administrative Core (AC) to maximize resources, identify novel directions for the Partnership, and report the progress of Partnership cores and investigators to institutional leaders and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The PEC maintains internal and external advisory groups to support strategic planning, monitoring, and evaluation of Partnership activities by assessing the relationships between aims, activities, outputs, and expected outcomes. The two essential PEC advisory groups are the Internal Advisory Committee (IAC), and the Program Steering Committee (PSC). The IAC and PSC work closely together within the PEC to provide guidance and recommendations to the AC. The PEC establishes Logic Models for each Partnership component and provides continual updating to reflect the new aims, activities, and evolution of the Partnership. The PEC, in collaboration with the Quantitative Sciences Core (QSC), implemented the use of REDCap to track grants and publications (including journal impact factors) submitted and obtained by the Partnership researchers to streamline tracking. The PEC is a member of the Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity Evaluators Special Interest Group (PACHE SIG), which works to identify common elements for the evaluation of PACHE programs at the national level. The PEC will build on prior successes with the necessary flexibility to adapt and respond to emerging challenges, innovations, and developments. The specific aims of the PEC are: 1) Coordinate collection, tracking, and analysis of evaluation data for Partnership components processes and activities. This provides the AC with critical data needed to initiate, terminate, or modify new and ongoing initiatives to achieve the Partnership goals and objectives. The PEC incorporates Logic Models, web-based relational data systems for tracking outcomes, and annual Partnership member surveys to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of communications, interactions, and integration between/across Partnership components at both institutions. 2) Conduct internal evaluations of Partnership components through the activities of the IAC. The IAC will review quarterly progress reports for the Cores and research projects and provide summative feedback. The IAC will also collaborate with the AC to solicit and evaluate new research projects. 3) Implement external evaluations of Partnership components through the activities of the PSC and an external evaluation consultant. The PSC provides unbiased, rigorous, and expert evaluation of the progress of the Partnership annually and recommends improvements throughout the grant period via quarterly meetings with the AC.