课题基金 / 基金详情

Extracorporeal Support for Emergent (Uncontrolled) Donation Following Cardiac Dea

Extracorporeal Support for Emergent (Uncontrolled) Donation Following Cardiac Dea
心脏死亡后紧急(不受控制)捐赠的体外支持
批准号:
7943023
负责人:
Shawn J Pelletier
金额:
$29.18万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2009
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2009-09-30 至 2012-08-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Shawn J Pelletier的其他基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
描述(由申请人提供):心脏死亡后紧急(非受控)捐赠的体外支持介绍:用于移植的供体器官的有限可用性导致对心脏死亡后捐赠(DCD)供体使用的兴趣增加。然而,不受控制或紧急DCD (eDCD)的使用受到后勤困难的限制,除了极少数例外,没有得到利用。eDCD涉及从复苏失败而死亡的病人身上获取器官。在许多情况下,患者遭受了致命的创伤或意外的心脏骤停。尝试复苏,直到它被认为是无效的重建循环,这是由内科医生在急诊科或重症监护病房作出的决定。为了限制可移植器官的热缺血损伤,有必要在宣布死亡后立即提供腹部器官的原位保存。自2000年10月以来,密歇根大学在控制DCD捐赠者被宣布死亡后使用常温体外支持(ECS)。供体腹部器官被恢复到正常功能并维持,直到它们以半选择性的方式获得,类似于脑死亡后的捐赠。我们对36例控制的DCD供者使用了ECS-DCD,结果取了67个肾脏、19个肝脏和6个胰腺进行移植。与不使用ECS的快速恢复DCD相比,ECS-DCD导致每个供者移植器官数量增加(OTPD),肾脏DGF率下降(8%),肝脏受体和移植物存活率与DBD供者相似。我们最近对1049名受试者进行了一项具有全国代表性的调查,询问他们在脑死亡、心源性死亡后的受控捐赠和心源性死亡后的紧急捐赠三种情况下对器官捐赠的偏好。令我们惊讶的是,受试者在控制死亡和紧急心脏死亡的情况下比在脑死亡的情况下更愿意捐赠。这些结果表明,普通公众实际上比DBD更支持DCD,包括紧急情况。在过去的一年里,密歇根大学已经制定了使用ecs辅助紧急(不受控制的)DCD捐赠的方案。该协议是与移植中心和急诊科共同制定的,并已由密歇根生命之礼、密歇根大学成人伦理委员会和密歇根生命之礼捐赠者家庭顾问进行了审查和批准。在密歇根大学急诊科进行复苏失败的同意潜在捐赠者(来自捐赠者登记处或家属)将在宣布死亡后接受股动脉和静脉插管。将启动体外支持以恢复腹腔器官的灌注。主动脉闭塞球囊将放置在腹腔上位置,以防止冠状动脉或脑血管的再灌注。然后在手术室中获取腹部器官并按标准方式进行分配。在18个月的时间里,45名患者在密歇根大学急诊科接受了心肺复苏术/ACLS。其中,84%死于急诊科,可能是潜在的紧急DCD供体。在排除不符合条件的潜在供体(年龄在60岁左右、恶性肿瘤、多系统器官衰竭和HIV感染)后,大约17名患者被确定为可能的紧急DCD供体,密歇根大学的供体池增加了52%。在未来两年,预计将实现以下具体目标:与控制的DCD和DBD相比,确定紧急DCD的供体数量和OTPD。2. 比较从紧急DCD供者移植的肾脏(1年)和肝脏和肾脏(2年)与对照DCD和DBD供者的结果。3. 比较潜在捐赠家庭对紧急DCD、控制DCD和DBD的看法和态度。结论:基于初步观察,我们期望发现eDCD导致a)器官供体数量的显著增加,b)与DBD和控制DCD相比,移植肾存活率相似,c)与DBD相比,供体家庭对eDCD的接受程度相似或更高。如果ECS-eDCD被捐赠家庭所接受,并且移植后的结果可以接受,我们将在密歇根生命之礼捐赠服务区扩大其使用范围,研究足够大的人群,以支持发展一个国家项目。
英文摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Extracorporeal Support for Emergent (Uncontrolled) Donation Following Cardiac Death Introduction: The limited availability of donor organs for transplantation has led to an increased interest in the use of donation following cardiac death (DCD) donors. However, uncontrolled or emergent DCD (eDCD) use has been limited by logistical difficulties and, with rare exception, has not been utilized. eDCD involves procuring organs from a patient who dies following unsuccessful resuscitative efforts. In many situations, patients have suffered either fatal traumatic injury or unexpected cardiac arrest. Resuscitation is attempted until it is deemed futile in reestablishing circulation, a determination that is made by physicians within an emergency department or intensive care unit. In order to limit warm ischemic damage to transplantable organs, it is necessary to provide immediate in situ preservation of abdominal organs soon after death has been declared. Since October 2000, the University of Michigan has utilized normothermic extracorporeal support (ECS) after death has been declared for controlled DCD donors. The donor abdominal organs are restored to normal function and maintained until they are procured in a semi-elective fashion, similar to donation following brain death (DBD). We have used ECS-DCD for 36 controlled DCD donors, resulting in 67 kidneys, 19 livers, and 6 pancreata taken for transplantation. Compared to rapid recovery DCD without the use of ECS, ECS-DCD resulted in a greater number of organs transplanted per donor (OTPD), decreased kidney DGF rates (8%) and liver recipient and graft survival rates similar to DBD donors. We recently conducted a nationally representative survey of 1,049 subjects and asked their preference for organ donation given scenarios describing brain death, controlled donation following cardiac death, and emergent donation following cardiac death. To our surprise, subjects were much more willing to donate in the setting of both controlled and emergent cardiac death rather than brain death. These results suggest that the general public is actually more supportive of DCD, including emergent, than DBD. Over the past year, the University of Michigan has developed protocols for the use of ECS-assisted emergent (uncontrolled) DCD donation. This protocol has been developed in conjunction with the Transplant Center and the Emergency Department and has been reviewed and approved by Gift of Life Michigan, the University of Michigan Adult Ethics Committee, and the Gift of Life Michigan Donor Family Counsel. Consenting potential donors (either from donor registry or family) who fail resuscitative efforts in the University of Michigan Emergency Department will undergo cannulation of the femoral artery and vein after pronouncement of death. Extracorporeal support will be initiated to restore perfusion to abdominal organs. An aortic occlusion balloon will be placed in a supraceliac position to prevent reperfusion of the coronary or cerebral vasculature. Abdominal organs will then be procured in the operating room and allocated in a standard fashion. During an 18 month period, 45 patients received CPR/ACLS in the Emergency Department at the University of Michigan. Of these, 84% died in the ED and may have been potential emergent DCD donors. After excluding ineligible potential donors (age > 60 years, malignancy, multisystem organ failure, and HIV infection), approximately 17 patients were identified as likely emergent DCD donors, increasing the donor pool at the University of Michigan by 52%. Over the next 2 years, the following specific aims are expected to be achieved: 1. To determine the number of donors and OTPD for emergent DCD when compared to controlled DCD and DBD. 2. To compare the outcomes of kidneys (year 1) and livers and kidneys (year 2) transplanted from emergent DCD donors when compared to controlled DCD and DBD donors. 3. To compare perceptions and attitudes of potential donor families to emergent DCD, controlled DCD, and DBD. Conclusions: Based on preliminary observations, we expect to find that eDCD results in a) a significant increase in the number of organ donors, b) similar rates of kidney graft survival compared to DBD and controlled DCD, and c) similar or greater acceptance of eDCD when compared to DBD by donor families. If ECS-eDCD is well accepted by donor families and results in acceptable posttransplant outcomes, we would then expand its use throughout the Gift of Life Michigan donor service area to study a large enough population to support developing a national program. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The limited availability of donor organs for transplantation has led to an increased interest in the use of donation following cardiac death (DCD) donors, or donation after the heart has stopped compared to death defined as lack of blood flow to the brain (donation following brain death). Because of logistic difficulties, obtaining organs for transplant from people who die after cardiac arrest in an emergency room is rarely performed. This project proposes to study a new method of perfusing organs using a technique similar to heart-lung bypass after a consenting donor is declared dead to preserve abdominal organs for transplant and allow procuring them to occur in an easier fashion.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Extracorporeal Support for Emergent (Uncontrolled) Donation Following Cardiac Dea