Comparison of three quantitative phosphoproteomic strategies to study receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.
Comparison of three quantitative phosphoproteomic strategies to study receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/pr200697x
复制
发表时间:
2011-12-02
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Neubert, Thomas A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang, Guoan;Neubert, Thomas A.
关键词:
There are three quantitative phosphoproteomic strategies most commonly used to study receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling. These strategies quantify changes in: (1) all three forms of phosphosites (phosphoserine, phosphothreonine and phosphotyrosine) following enrichment of phosphopeptides by titanium dioxide or immobilized metal affinity chromatography; (2) phosphotyrosine sites following anti- phosphotyrosine antibody enrichment of phosphotyrosine peptides; or (3) phosphotyrosine proteins and their binding partners following anti-phosphotyrosine protein immunoprecipitation. However, it is not clear from literature which strategy is more effective. In this study, we assessed the utility of these three phosphoproteomic strategies in RTK signaling studies by using EphB receptor signaling as an example. We used all three strategies with stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) to compare changes in phosphoproteomes upon EphB receptor activation. We used bioinformatic analysis to compare results from the three analyses. Our results show that the three strategies provide complementary information about RTK pathways. Quantitative phosphoproteomic strategies are most commonly used to study receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling by quantifying changes in: (1) phosphopeptides containing pS, pT, or pY; (2) phosphotyrosine-containing peptides; (3) phosphotyrosine-containing proteins. In this study, we assessed the utility of the three strategies for RTK signaling studies by using EphB receptor signaling as an example. Our results show that the three strategies are very complementary in providing information about RTK pathways.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Huttlin EL;Jedrychowski MP;Elias JE;Goswami T;Rad R;Beausoleil SA;Villén J;Haas W;Sowa ME;Gygi SP
通讯作者:
Gygi SP
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Jensen LJ;Kuhn M;Stark M;Chaffron S;Creevey C;Muller J;Doerks T;Julien P;Roth A;Simonovic M;Bork P;von Mering C
通讯作者:
von Mering C
影响因子:
46.9
作者:
Dengjel, Joern;Akimov, Vyacheslav;Andersen, Jens S.
通讯作者:
Andersen, Jens S.
影响因子:
46.9
作者:
Blagoev, B;Ong, SE;Mann, M
通讯作者:
Mann, M
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Letunic I;Doerks T;Bork P
通讯作者:
Bork P