Different visual evoked potentials in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis and idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis: a prospective longitudinal analysis.
Different visual evoked potentials in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis and idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis: a prospective longitudinal analysis.
复制标题
视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病相关视神经炎和特发性脱髓鞘性视神经炎的不同视觉诱发电位:前瞻性纵向分析
DOI:
10.1186/s12886-022-02595-5
复制
发表时间:
2022-09-21
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Yang, Hui
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zheng, Cong;Wang, Ling;Xu, Xiaoyu;Zhou, Manli;Liu, Kaiqun;Zhang, Yuxin;Zhao, Xiujuan;Lu, Lin;Qiu, Wei;Zhang, Xinyu;Yang, Hui
关键词:
To investigate different visual evoked potential (VEP) patterns in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON) and idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis (IDON). This was a longitudinal, prospective, case-control study. Eighty-four Chinese patients with acute optic neuritis were enrolled, including 26 NMOSD-ON patients and 58 IDON patients. All the patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and full-field pattern reversal VEP recordings at the onset, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Within 15′ checks, the NMOSD-ON patients had more severe VEP amplitude reduction at 6 months (2.39 ± 4.63 μV vs. 6.96 ± 8.88 μV, P = 0.034). However, the IDON patients showed more frequently normal VEP response at 3 months (24.0% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.017), and only prolonged P100 peak latency with normal amplitude (L) at 6 months (30.0% vs. 57.8%, P = 0.048). Within 60′ checks, no significant difference in VEP parameters between the two groups was found at each follow-up (P > 0.05). The NMOSD-ON patients showed more severe axonal damage and worse axonal recovery than the IDON patients. VEP elicited by smaller check size was more sensitive to visual pathway abnormality in NMOSD-ON.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
9.9
作者:
Vidal-Jordana A;Rovira A;Arrambide G;Otero-Romero S;Río J;Comabella M;Nos C;Castilló J;Galan I;Cabello S;Moncho D;Rahnama K;Thonon V;Rodríguez-Acevedo B;Zabalza A;Midaglia L;Auger C;Sastre-Garriga J;Montalban X;Tintoré M
通讯作者:
Tintoré M
影响因子:
9.9
作者:
Wingerchuk DM;Banwell B;Bennett JL;Cabre P;Carroll W;Chitnis T;de Seze J;Fujihara K;Greenberg B;Jacob A;Jarius S;Lana-Peixoto M;Levy M;Simon JH;Tenembaum S;Traboulsee AL;Waters P;Wellik KE;Weinshenker BG;International Panel for NMO Diagnosis
通讯作者:
International Panel for NMO Diagnosis
影响因子:
9.9
作者:
Naismith, R. T.;Tutlam, N. T.;Cross, A. H.
通讯作者:
Cross, A. H.
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Jones, SJ;Brusa, A
通讯作者:
Brusa, A
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Schulze-Bonsel, K;Feltgen, N;Bach, M
通讯作者:
Bach, M