Decreasing age disparities in syphilis and gonorrhea incidence rates in the United States, 1981--2005.
Decreasing age disparities in syphilis and gonorrhea incidence rates in the United States, 1981--2005.
复制标题
1981 年-2005 年美国梅毒和淋病发病率的年龄差异不断缩小。
DOI:
10.1097/olq.0b013e31816a8dcd
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Miller,WilliamC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Miller,WilliamC
During the past 25 years, rates of syphilis and gonorrhea have declined, although in recent years, this trend has been reversing. 1 Given the considerable public health efforts to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV infection, the historical decline was expected, but the more recent increases in syphilis and gonorrhea are disturbing. What is responsible for these changes? The details, the underlying trends and relationships, are less apparent. In which groups are changes occurring? What groups are responsible for the recently observed increases?In this issue of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Chesson et al. 2 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention present data to suggest that as the rates of syphilis and gonorrhea declined during the past 25 years, the age disparity in these rates narrowed. STIs are predominantly infections of youth. Presumably, young adults are more likely to demonstrate riskier sexual behavior, and thereby, acquire STIs more commonly. The disparities in the rates of gonorrhea and syphilis across age groups are quite striking. For syphilis, reported rates in younger adults (aged 15–29 years) were roughly three times higher than in older adults (aged 40–54 years) throughout the 1980s. Chesson et al. 2 reported that rates in younger adults are only slightly higher than in older adults. In contrast, reported rates for gonorrhea remain approximately 10 times higher in younger adults, when compared with older adults. Nonetheless, this gap represents a substantial decline from the early 1980s when rates in young adults were nearly 16 times higher. What can we learn from these rate changes? What new questions do these observations raise?
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
M. Lichten;R. Borts;James E. Haber
通讯作者:
M. Lichten;R. Borts;James E. Haber
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
R. Liskay;J. Stachelek
通讯作者:
J. Stachelek
影响因子:
5.6
作者:
Nolan H. Sigal;B. Alberts
通讯作者:
B. Alberts
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
LEHRMAN, MA;SCHNEIDER, WJ;RUSSELL, DW
通讯作者:
RUSSELL, DW
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Ennis,DG;Amundsen,SK;Smith,GR
通讯作者:
Smith,GR