Commentary: Defining self-harm: how inconsistencies in language persist - a commentary/reflection on Ward and Curran (2021).
Commentary: Defining self-harm: how inconsistencies in language persist - a commentary/reflection on Ward and Curran (2021).
复制标题
评论:定义自残:语言中的不一致如何持续存在 - 对沃德和柯伦的评论/反思(2021)。
DOI:
10.1111/camh.12502
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
6.1
通讯作者:
Wilson E
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wilson E
Self‐harm definition is an important focus of academic research and clinical practice. The precise definition of self‐harm has been contested for decades, and current terminology varies across, and sometimes within, countries. This commentary has been written to highlight the problematic use of the term ‘deliberate’ self‐harm (i.e. DSH) and to clarify the terminology currently recommended by clinical agencies in the United Kingdom. Comparisons will be made to other definitions in the field, such as non‐suicidal self‐injury (NSSI), with the aim of contributing to the worldwide discussion about how we conceptualise, discuss and treat suicidal and non‐suicidal behaviours. The commentary concludes by highlighting the findings of Ward and Curran (2021). It is suggested that undiagnosed ADHD may be a potential driver for self‐harm, particularly among girls, further highlighting the ongoing challenges in identifying and predicting which youth are at risk for self‐harm and suicidal behaviours. Central to this challenge has been the long‐standing confusion around the best way to define self‐harm.
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Dennis Ougrin;R. Corrigall;D. Ståhl;J. Poole;Tobias Zundel;Mandy Wait;V. Slater;P. Reavey;S. Byford;J. Ivens;Maarten Crommelin;D. Hayes;Kerry Middleton;Paul Young;E. Taylor
通讯作者:
E. Taylor
影响因子:
6.1
作者:
J. Ward;S. Curran
通讯作者:
S. Curran
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Holtmann, Martin;Becker, Andreas;Roessner, Veit
通讯作者:
Roessner, Veit