Patterns of narrative discourse in early recovery following severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Patterns of narrative discourse in early recovery following severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02699052.2019.1682192
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Togher L
Togher L
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Power E;Weir S;Richardson J;Fromm D;Forbes M;MacWhinney B;Togher L

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

调查严重创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 患者早期康复期间叙事话语障碍的性质和模式。对 42 名患有严重 TBI 的参与者在受伤后 3 个月和 6 个月时进行了一项单一图像图片描述任务。 37 名对照参与者也执行了相同的任务。通过生产力、信息量和故事组织的测量来分析话语样本。将 TBI 患者在 3 个月和 6 个月时的表现与对照组进行比较,并且还比较了 TBI 参与者在两个时间点的表现。还检查了个人的表现模式。推论分析显示,对照组和 TBI 组在两个时间点的信息量和 3 个月时完整发作次数方面存在显着差异,但生产力指标没有显着差异。 TBI 组在 3 至 6 个月期间没有显着变化。然而,随着时间的推移,观察到个体的改善。患有 TBI 的人在 TBI 后早期就会出现言语困难,并且在受伤后 6 个月也会出现这种情况。为了理解长期话语恢复,有必要检查参与者在这一叙事任务的进一步时间点上的模式。
To investigate the nature and patterns of narrative discourse impairment in people with severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) during early recovery. A single image picture description task was administered to 42 participants with severe TBI at 3 and 6-months post-injury. The same task was administered to 37 control participants. Discourse samples were analyzed with measures of productivity, informativeness and story organization. The performance of people with TBI was compared with the control group at both 3 and 6 months, and the performance of the participants with TBI was also compared across the two time points. Individual patterns of performance were also examined. Inferential analyses revealed significant differences between the control group and the group with TBI on informativeness at both time points and number of complete episodes at 3 months, but no significant differences for productivity measures. There was no significant change for the group with TBI between 3 and 6 months. However, individual improvement over time was observed. People with TBI have discourse difficulties early post TBI that are also present at 6-months post-injury. In order to understand longer-term discourse recovery, it is necessary to examine participant patterns over further time points on this narrative task.
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/099
发表时间: 2002-12-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Coelho, CA
通讯作者: Coelho, CA
DOI: 10.1007/bf01068887
发表时间: 1990-11-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
COELHO, CA;LILES, BZ;DUFFY, RJ
通讯作者: DUFFY, RJ
DOI: 10.3109/02699059109008111
发表时间: 1991-01-01
期刊: Brain Injury
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
COELHO C A;LILES B Z;DUFFY R J
通讯作者: DUFFY R J
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.003
发表时间: 2004-06-01
期刊: BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Davis, GA;Coelho, CA
通讯作者: Coelho, CA
DOI: 10.3109/02699059509008206
发表时间: 1995-07-01
期刊: BRAIN INJURY
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
COELHO, CA;LILES, BZ;DUFFY, RJ
通讯作者: DUFFY, RJ