Paradigms: How Far Does Research in Distributed Leadership ‘Stretch’?
Paradigms: How Far Does Research in Distributed Leadership ‘Stretch’?
复制标题
范式：分布式领导力研究“延伸”了多远？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Hartley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Hartley
Burrell和Morgan的被广泛引用的“社会学范式和组织分析”在这里被应用于研究教育中的分布式领导。几乎所有现存的研究都是规范性的，而不是激进的;它所产生的证据广泛地福尔斯解释主义的范式。很少有研究产生了“科学的”工具性知识，这将使他们在功能主义的范式。更少的研究符合激进人文主义和激进结构主义的范式。顺便说一句，伯勒尔和摩根的类型学是比较Ribbins和冈特的知识省份和学校领导研究中的群体。
Burrell and Morgan’s widely-cited ‘Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis’ is applied here to research on distributed leadership in education. Nearly all of the extant research is regulatory, not radical; and the evidence which it has generated falls broadly within the paradigm of interpretivism. Few studies have generated the ‘scientific’ instrumental knowledge which would place them within the paradigm of functionalism. Even fewer studies fit the paradigms of radical humanism and radical structuralism. In passing, Burrell and Morgan’s typology is compared to Ribbins and Gunter’s knowledge provinces and groups within school leadership studies.
教育领导领域的知识生产：思想史的场所
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Gunter H
通讯作者：
Gunter H