Bmc Complementary and Alternative Medicine Is Complementary and Alternative Medicine (cam) Cost-effective? a Systematic Review

Bmc Complementary and Alternative Medicine Is Complementary and Alternative Medicine (cam) Cost-effective? a Systematic Review
复制标题

Bmc 补充和替代医学 补充和替代医学 (cam) 具有成本效益吗?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
O. Caspi
O. Caspi
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Herman;Benjamin Matthew Craig;O. Caspi

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

背景:美国每年超过 340 亿美元的自付费用显然证明了人们普遍认为补充和替代医学 (CAM) 疗法的益处大于其成本。然而,无论公众舆论如何,关于 CAM 疗法对健康和经济影响的证据往往只是轶事证据。本研究的目的是概述经济评估,并在之前的审查基础上进行扩展,以检验 CAM 经济评估的当前范围和质量。
Background: Out-of-pocket expenditures of over $34 billion per year in the US are an apparent testament to a widely held belief that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies have benefits that outweigh their costs. However, regardless of public opinion, there is often little more than anecdotal evidence on the health and economic implications of CAM therapies. The objectives of this study are to present an overview of economic evaluation and to expand upon a previous review to examine the current scope and quality of CAM economic evaluations.
腰部护理的脊椎按摩疗法和医疗费用:基于实践的观察性研究的结果。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊: The American journal of managed care
影响因子: --
作者:
Stano,Miron;Haas,Mitchell;Goldberg,Bruce;Traub,PaulM;Nyiendo,Joanne
通讯作者: Nyiendo,Joanne
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2002.08.301
发表时间: 2002-06-15
影响因子: 45.3
作者:
Jacobsen, PB;Meade, CD;Ruckdeschel, JC
通讯作者: Ruckdeschel, JC
在临床环境中进行成本效益分析时要考虑什么。
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(98)00266-1
发表时间: 1998
期刊: Journal of the American Dietetic Association.
影响因子: --
作者:
Naglak,M;Mitchell,DC;Kris-Etherton,P;Harkness,W;Pearson,TA
通讯作者: Pearson,TA
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00001
发表时间: 1997-11-01
期刊: MEDICAL CARE
影响因子: 3
作者:
Levin, JS;Glass, TA;Jonas, WB
通讯作者: Jonas, WB
管理式医疗和保险提供商对补充和替代医学的整合和报销:2000 年更新和队列分析。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊: Alternative therapies in health and medicine.
影响因子: --
作者:
Pelletier,KennethR;Astin,JohnA
通讯作者: Astin,JohnA