Characteristics of programmes designed to link community-dwelling older adults in high-income countries from community to clinical sectors: a scoping review protocol.
Characteristics of programmes designed to link community-dwelling older adults in high-income countries from community to clinical sectors: a scoping review protocol.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072617
复制
发表时间：
2023-09-12
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Schoenthaler, Antoinette
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gofine, Miriam;Laynor, Gregory;Schoenthaler, Antoinette
关键词：
迫切需要有效引导老年人接受初级保健的研究。社区-诊所联系模式（CCLMs）旨在通过将卫生部门和社区部门联系起来，改善人口健康，以便改善患者获得保健的机会，并最终改善人口健康。然而，关于将有未经治疗医疗需求的成年人与医疗保健部门联系起来的以社区为基础的切入点的研究尚处于起步阶段。针对一般成年人实施的cclm不一定适用于老年人。鉴于CCLM文献最近才出现，而且针对老年人的CCLM干预措施似乎很少，采用范围审查方法对这一主题的现有信息进行全面审查是合适的。该议定书将为范围审查提供信息，审查将老年人与卫生保健部门联系起来的社区规划的特点。本方案是根据JBI证据综合最佳实践指南和制定范围审查方案的报告项目制定的。拟议的范围审查将遵循Levac及其同事对Arksey和O ' malley的范围审查方法的更新。根据Levesque及其同事的《获得健康的概念框架》，系统和个人层面的医疗保健获取将在数据提取和分析中进行操作。该方案符合用于系统评价的首选报告项目和用于范围评价的元分析扩展。从2023年8月或更晚开始，引文数据库(AgeLine (Ebsco)；CINAHL完成;MEDLINE (PubMed);Scopus Advanced (Elsevier)；社会服务文摘（ProQuest）检索Web of Science Core Collection （Clarivate）和灰色文献（b谷歌；American Public Health Association Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings; SIREN Evidence & Resource Library）。作者计划在会议论文集中传播他们的发现，并在同行评议的期刊上发表，并将提取的数据存入Figshare数据库。这项研究不需要机构审查委员会的批准。在开放科学框架（DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2EF9D）中注册的协议。
Research on effectively navigating older adults into primary care is urgently needed. Community–clinic linkage models (CCLMs) aim to improve population health by linking the health and community sectors in order to improve patients’ access to healthcare and, ultimately, population health. However, research on community-based points of entry linking adults with untreated medical needs into the healthcare sector is nascent. CCLMs implemented for the general adult population are not necessarily accessible to older adults. Given the recency of the CCLM literature and the seeming rarity of CCLM interventions designed for older adults, it is appropriate to employ scoping review methodology in order to generate a comprehensive review of the available information on this topic. This protocol will inform a scoping review that reviews characteristics of community-based programmes that link older adults with the healthcare sector. The present protocol was developed as per JBI Evidence Synthesis best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. The proposed scoping review will follow Levac and colleagues’ update to Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology. Healthcare access at the system and individual levels will be operationalised in data extraction and analysis in accordance with Levesque and colleagues’ Conceptual Framework of Access to Health. The protocol complies with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Beginning in August 2023 or later, citation databases (AgeLine (Ebsco); CINAHL Complete; MEDLINE (PubMed); Scopus Advanced (Elsevier); Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest); Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate)) and grey literature (Google; American Public Health Association Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings; SIREN Evidence & Resource Library) will be searched. The authors plan to disseminate their findings in conference proceedings and publication in a peer-reviewed journal and deposit extracted data in the Figshare depository. The study does not require Institutional Review Board approval. Protocol registered in Open Science Framework (DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2EF9D).
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Gough C;Lewis LK;Barr C;Maeder A;George S
通讯作者：
George S
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Gardiner E;Wong V;Lin G;Miller AR
通讯作者：
Miller AR
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
D'Avolio, Deborah A.;Strumpf, Neville E.;Rebholz, Casey M.
通讯作者：
Rebholz, Casey M.
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Barnes, Timothy L.;MacLeod, Stephanie;Yeh, Charlotte S.
通讯作者：
Yeh, Charlotte S.
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Choi NG;Dinitto DM
通讯作者：
Dinitto DM