Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research.
Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00179.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wewers ME
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hood NE;Brewer T;Jackson R;Wewers ME
社区参与是由美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）资助的临床和转化科学奖（CTSA）的创新和必要组成部分。然而，社区参与NIH资助的研究的程度以前没有被检查过。本研究评估了一所大型中西部大学的社区参与活动在NIH资助的研究中的基线流行率。通过电子邮件向最近NIH资助的研究的主要研究者发送在线调查（N = 480）。研究人员被要求确定每项研究中发生了哪些类型的社区参与活动。40.4%（194/480）的研究收到了回复。总体而言，42.6%的人报告了任何社区参与活动。更多的协作型参与（例如，社区咨询委员会）比需要较少参与的活动（例如，与社区成员分享研究成果）。与所有其他研究相比，具有更多协作社区参与的研究不太可能被描述为基础或临床前研究。鉴于NIH的包容性呼吁社区参与研究，相对较少的NIH资助的研究报告社区参与活动，虽然这项研究使用了广泛的定义社区和广泛的参与类型。这些发现可用于通知CTSA社区参与计划的目标。
Community engagement is an innovative and required component for Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). However, the extent of community engagement in NIH-funded research has not been previously examined. This study assessed baseline prevalence of community engagement activities among NIH-funded studies at a large Midwestern university with a CTSA. An online survey was e-mailed to principal investigators of recent NIH-funded studies (N = 480). Investigators were asked to identify what types of community engagement activities had occurred for each study. Responses were received for 40.4% (194/480) of studies. Overall, 42.6% reported any community engagement activities. More collaborative types of engagement (e.g., community advisory board) were less common than activities requiring less engagement (e.g., sharing study results with community members). Studies with more collaborative community engagement were less likely to be described as basic or preclinical research compared to all other studies. Given NIH’s inclusive call for community engagement in research, relatively few NIH-funded studies reported community engagement activities, although this study used a broad definition of community and a wide range of types of engagement. These findings may be used to inform the goals of CTSA community engagement programs.
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Lindenmeyer, Antje;Hearnshaw, Hilary;Aitchison, Geoff
通讯作者：
Aitchison, Geoff
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Kleinman, Michael S.;Mold, James W.
通讯作者：
Mold, James W.
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Calleson, DC;Jordan, C;Seifer, SD
通讯作者：
Seifer, SD