A comparison of neighbourhood level variation and risk factors for affective versus non-affective psychosis.
A comparison of neighbourhood level variation and risk factors for affective versus non-affective psychosis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.schres.2022.05.015
复制
发表时间:
2023-06
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Agerbo, Esben
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schofield, Peter;Horsdal, Henriette Thisted;Das-Munshi, Jayati;Thygesen, Malene;Pedersen, Carsten;Morgan, Craig;Agerbo, Esben
Studies typically highlight area level variation in the incidence of non-affective but not affective psychoses. We compared neighbourhood-level variation for both types of disorder, and the specific effects of neighbourhood urbanicity and ethnic density, using Danish national registry data. Population based cohort (2,224,464 people) followed from 1980 to 2013 with neighbourhood exposure measured at age 15 and incidence modelled using multilevel Poisson regression. Neighbourhood variation was similar for both disorders with an adjusted median risk ratio of 1.37 (95% CI 1.34–1.39) for non-affective psychosis and 1.43 (1.38–1.49) for affective psychosis. Associations with neighbourhood urbanicity differed: living in the most compared to the least urban quintile at age 15 was associated with a minimal increase in subsequent affective psychosis, IRR 1.13 (1.01–1.27) but a substantial increase in rates of non-affective psychosis, IRR 1.66 (1.57–1.75). Mixed results were found for neighbourhood ethnic density: for Middle Eastern migrants there was an increased average incidence of both affective, IRR 1.54 (1.19–1.99), and non-affective psychoses, 1.13 (1.04–1.23) associated with each decrease in ethnic density quintile, with a similar pattern for African migrants, but for European migrants ethnic density appeared to be associated with non-affective psychosis only. While overall variation and the effect of neighbourhood ethnic density were similar for both types of disorder, associations with urbanicity were largely confined to non-affective psychosis. This may reflect differences in aetiological pathways although the mechanism behind these differences remains unknown.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Mezuk B;Li X;Cederin K;Concha J;Kendler KS;Sundquist J;Sundquist K
通讯作者:
Sundquist K
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Mors, Ole;Perto, Gurli P.;Mortensen, Preben Bo
通讯作者:
Mortensen, Preben Bo
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Kirkbride JB;Jones PB;Ullrich S;Coid JW
通讯作者:
Coid JW
影响因子:
6.9
作者:
Kirkbride, James B.;Morgan, Craig;Jones, Peter B.
通讯作者:
Jones, Peter B.
影响因子:
25.8
作者:
Jongsma, Hannah E.;Gayer-Anderson, Charlotte;Kirkbride, James B.
通讯作者:
Kirkbride, James B.