Why 'one size fits all' is not enough when designing COVID-19 immunity certificates for domestic use: a UK-wide cross-sectional online survey.
Why 'one size fits all' is not enough when designing COVID-19 immunity certificates for domestic use: a UK-wide cross-sectional online survey.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058317
复制
发表时间：
2022-04-15
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Balatsoukas, Panagiotis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Niculaescu, Corina Elena;Sassoon, Isabel;Landa-Avila, Irma Cecilia;Colak, Ozlem;Jun, Gyuchan Thomas;Balatsoukas, Panagiotis
本研究探讨了公众在六种不同的国内场景中使用 COVID-19 免疫证书的意愿。横断面在线调查。英国代表性调查于 2021 年 8 月 3 日进行。调查对象为 534 名 18 岁以上的英国居民。参与者回答了同一组问题。主要结果指标是在三种不同的家庭环境中使用免疫证书的意愿：（1）因非紧急健康问题去看全科医生（GP）； (2) 在餐厅用餐以及 (3) 在剧院观看表演。对于每种设置，都提供了两个选项，一个优先考虑便利性（选项 A），另一个优先考虑隐私（选项 B）。我们的次要结果指标是根据健康信念模型改编的项目计算出的指数；对与服务提供者分享豁免状态的态度；在接受 COVID-19 之前的生活方式。此外，我们还记录了有关受访者社会人口特征的数据。受访者在看全科医生时更愿意使用优先考虑便利性的免疫证书（92%），而不是隐私（76%）。然而，与便利性（分别为 38% 和 39%）相比，其他两种环境（在餐厅用餐（84%）和去剧院（83%））的隐私性更有利。对 COVID-19 和免疫证书的个人信念与在所有情况下使用这些证书的意愿的差异相关。在社会人口统计学和生活方式方面没有观察到变化。这项调查的结果表明，设计免疫证书并不存在一刀切的解决方案。免疫证书是复杂的社会技术系统，任何将其用于家庭用途的尝试都应根据不同的环境和用户需求进行定制。认证服务的设计需要采用更加基于证据的方法，并且需要进一步研究以了解不同的设置、设计元素（如便利性或隐私）和个人对流感大流行的信念应如何影响其设计。
The present study explored public’s willingness to use COVID-19 immunity certificates across six different domestic scenarios. Cross-sectional online survey. UK representative survey conducted on 3 August 2021. 534 UK residents over 18 years old. Participants replied to the same set of questions. The primary outcome measure was willingness to use immunity certificates across three different domestic settings: (1) visiting the general practitioner (GP) for a non-urgent health issue; (2) dining in a restaurant and (3) attending a performance in a theatre. For each setting two options, one prioritising convenience (option A) and the other privacy (option B), were offered. Our secondary outcome measures were computed indices from items adapted from the Health Belief Model; attitudes towards sharing immunity status with service providers; prior to COVID-19 lifestyle. In addition, we recorded data about respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics. Respondents were more willing to use immunity certificates that prioritised convenience (92%), rather than privacy (76%), when visiting their GP. However, privacy was more favourable in the other two settings (dining in a restaurant (84%) and going to a theatre (83%)) compared with convenience (38% and 39% respectively). Personal beliefs about COVID-19 and immunity certificates were associated with variations in willingness to use these across all scenarios. No variations were observed across sociodemographics and lifestyle. The findings of this survey suggest that there is not one-size-fits-all solution for designing immunity certificates. Immunity certificates are complex sociotechnical systems, any attempt to implement these for domestic use should be tailored to different settings and user needs. The design of certification services requires a more evidence-based approach and further research is needed to understand how different settings, design elements (like convenience or privacy) and personal beliefs about the pandemic should inform their design.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Aranzales I;Chan HF;Eichenberger R;Hegselmann R;Stadelmann D;Torgler B
通讯作者：
Torgler B
基于区块链的COVID-19数字医疗护照和免疫证书的解决方案。
DOI：
10.1109/access.2020.3043350
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions
影响因子：
--
作者：
Hasan HR;Salah K;Jayaraman R;Arshad J;Yaqoob I;Omar M;Ellahham S
通讯作者：
Ellahham S
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Chu H;Liu S
通讯作者：
Liu S
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Bramstedt, Katrina A.
通讯作者：
Bramstedt, Katrina A.
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Kosciejew, Marc Richard Hugh
通讯作者：
Kosciejew, Marc Richard Hugh