Democratic innovations in municipal planning: Potentials and challenges of place-based platforms for deliberation between politicians and citizens
Democratic innovations in municipal planning: Potentials and challenges of place-based platforms for deliberation between politicians and citizens
复制标题
市政规划中的民主创新：政治家和公民之间协商的地方平台的潜力和挑战
DOI：
10.1016/j.cities.2021.103317
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
Annika Agger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Annika Agger
近年来，研究和国际气候治理都强调了动员公民和地方利益攸关方努力应对气候变化的重要性。尽管国际上对公众参与的制度创新重新产生了兴趣，关于民主创新的文献也越来越多，但很少有人充分考虑到以正式的地方平台形式邀请公共和私人行为者合作的影响，旨在创造创新的气候政策解决方案。本文评估了一个“混合民主”的模式，在一个市政机构创新的形式设计为一个“临时委员会”，由当选议员和任命的公民谁合作设计一个新的地方可持续发展战略。本文采用定性的方法，分析了这一过程中的制度设计和参与者之间的讨论。这项研究有两个主要发现。第一，虽然人们对更具协作性和参与性的审议方式有一个普遍的评价，但政治家们不愿意将权力下放给非选举产生的行为者。第二，这种混合模式的主要效果是提高了合法性以及政治家和公民之间的相互理解，而不是创新政策和大胆的市政气候治理。
In recent years, the importance of mobilizing citizens and local stakeholders in efforts to address climate change has been highlighted in both research and international climate governance. Despite an international resurgence of interest in institutional innovations for public engagement and a growing literature on democratic innovation, few have fully considered the effects of invited spaces in the form of formal local platforms for collaboration between public and private actors aimed at creating innovative climate policy solutions. This article assesses a model of ‘hybrid democracy’ in the form of a municipal institutional innovation designed as a ‘temporary committee’ consisting of elected councillors and appointed citizens who collaborate on designing a new local strategy for sustainable development. Using a qualitative approach, the article analyses the institutional design and the deliberations among the participants in the process. Two main findings emerge from the study. First, although there is a general appraisal of the more collaborative and participatory modes of engaging in deliberations, the politicians are reluctant to delegate power to non-elected actors. Second, the main effect of this hybrid model is enhanced legitimacy and a mutual understanding between politicians and citizens, rather than innovative policies and bold municipal climate governance.
构建城市创新协作平台：纽卡斯尔城市未来作为四螺旋中介
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Vallance P
通讯作者：
Vallance P
为集中治理系统中基于地方的领导力提供空间：纽卡斯尔城市期货案例
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Vallance P
通讯作者：
Vallance P