Quantifying discipline practices using absolute versus relative frequencies: clinical and research implications for child welfare.

Quantifying discipline practices using absolute versus relative frequencies: clinical and research implications for child welfare.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0886260513504650
复制
发表时间:
2014-01
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Kolko DJ
Kolko DJ
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lindhiem O;Shaffer A;Kolko DJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在家长干预结果文献中,管教实践通常被量化为绝对频率,或者不太常见的是相对频率。这些方法上的差异值得直接比较,因为它们对旨在减少父母攻击性和严厉管教的治疗方法的研究结果和结论具有重要影响。在这项研究中,我们直接比较了绝对频率法和相对频率法来量化身体攻击性、心理攻击性和非攻击性纪律实践。 3 年期间的纵向数据来自一项临床试验的现有数据集,该临床试验检查心理社会治疗在减少父母身体和心理攻击性以及改善儿童行为方面的有效性 (N = 139)。使用冲突策略量表(CTS)评估纪律做法(攻击性和非攻击性)。这两种方法产生了不同的结果模式,特别是对于非攻击性的纪律策略。我们建议每种方法都为更全面地理解父母攻击性与干预效果之间的关联做出自己独特的贡献。
In the parent intervention outcome literatures, discipline practices are generally quantified as absolute frequencies or, less commonly, as relative frequencies. These differences in methodology warrant direct comparison as they have critical implications for study results and conclusions among treatments targeted at reducing parental aggression and harsh discipline. In this study, we directly compared the absolute frequency method and the relative frequency method for quantifying physically aggressive, psychologically aggressive, and nonaggressive discipline practices. Longitudinal data over a 3-year period came from an existing data set of a clinical trial examining the effectiveness of a psychosocial treatment in reducing parental physical and psychological aggression and improving child behavior (N = 139). Discipline practices (both aggressive and nonaggressive) were assessed using the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). The two methods yielded different patterns of results, particularly for nonaggressive discipline strategies. We suggest that each method makes its own unique contribution to a more complete understanding of the association between parental aggression and intervention effects.
DOI: 10.1023/b:prev.0000023078.30191.e0
发表时间: 2004-06-01
期刊: PREVENTION SCIENCE
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
DeGarmo, DS;Patterson, GR;Forgatch, MS
通讯作者: Forgatch, MS
DOI: 10.1016/0145-2134(95)00113-1
发表时间: 1996-01-01
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Kolko, DJ
通讯作者: Kolko, DJ
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1990.tb00814.x
发表时间: 1990-07-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
KOLKO, DJ;LOAR, LL;STURNICK, D
通讯作者: STURNICK, D
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.67.5.711
发表时间: 1999-10-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Forgatch, MS;DeGarmo, DS
通讯作者: DeGarmo, DS
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-523
发表时间: 1991-09-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
CARR, EG;TAYLOR, JC;ROBINSON, S
通讯作者: ROBINSON, S